Report: GM Ordered Ignition Switches Before NHTSA Recall
In response to a report from the Wall Street Journal, the automaker stresses its safety recall reforms implemented in the past year.
by Staff
November 10, 2014
A technician replaces a faulty ignition switch on a Chevrolet Cobalt back in April. Photo courtesy of General Motors.
2 min to read
A technician replaces a faulty ignition switch on a Chevrolet Cobalt back in April. Photo courtesy of General Motors.
General Motors placed an urgent order for 500,000 replacement ignition switches for some of its small cars nearly two months before notifying the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the company’s ignition switch recall plans, reports the Wall Street Journal.
The newspaper cites e-mail sent between a GM contract worker and GM’s ignition switch supplier, Delphi Automotive. GM placed the order in the middle of December of 2013, while an ignition switch recall was announced later on Feb. 7. The time gap between the major replacement parts order and NHTSA notification isn’t addressed in the 315-page Valukas report, the newspaper notes.
Ad Loading...
In response to the Wall Street Journal article, GM released a statement: “These emails are further confirmation that our system needed reform, and we have done so. We have reorganized our entire safety investigation and decision process and have more investigators, move issues more quickly and make decisions with better data.”
The new recall procedure, GM said, can be summed up in three steps:
A potential issue review with appropriate data to determine whether further investigation is warranted.
An open investigation review recommends for or against a recall or other field action.
A group of senior leaders quickly decides whether or not a recall is warranted.
The Wall Street Journal received copies of the e-mail correspondence from Texas attorney Bob Hilliard, who is representing complainants claiming economic loss, death or injury tied to the defective ignition switches. Delphi provided copies of the e-mails to attorneys to comply with a discovery order issued as part of a court case in New York.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
