Are many drivers opting to turn off their vehicle’s lane departure warning system because they find the alarms unwarranted and annoying? That may often be the case, a recent observational study by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety suggests.
Ad Loading...
IIHS researchers examined 184 vehicles brought in for servicing at two Honda dealerships in Virginia. These vehicles — Accords, Odysseys and CR-Vs — were equipped with both forward collision warning and lane departure warning. Just one of the vehicles had the forward collision warning turned off, but two-thirds of them had the lane departure warning deactivated.
According to the IIHS Status Report, these findings are consistent with previous research involving lane departure warning systems installed in a range of vehicles from multiple automakers — not just Honda.
So why has lane departure warning drawn such a lukewarm response from drivers thus far, compared to other kinds of crash prevention technology such as forward collision warning, adaptive cruise control and blind spot monitoring?
IIHS researchers speculated that the occurrence of so-called false alarms may be linked to the failure of many drivers to use turn signals consistently. A lane change that isn’t preceded by a turn signal will trigger an alarm, and many drivers are lax about using their turn signal 100% of the time — especially in light traffic. Also, shifted lanes in construction zones might lead to more false alarms.
Additionally, IIHS researchers noted that in Honda models, it’s much easier to turn off lane departure warning compared to forward collision warning.
Ad Loading...
The new study raises questions about whether manufacturers can implement subtle changes to make lane departure warning a more popular and valued safety feature.
“In the future, it would be useful to compare systems with different types of alerts and levels of sensitivity to see whether those differences make people more or less likely to use the technologies,” said Ian Reagan, an IIHS senior research scientist who authored the study.
To view a video about Honda's lane departure warning system, click on the photo or link below the headline.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.