Following Another Vehicle Leads to Risky Driving
A new study from Arizona State University concludes that drivers who follow another car to a destination are more likely to drive dangerously.

Photo by Famartin/Wikimedia Commons.

Photo by Famartin/Wikimedia Commons.
“I know how to get there. Just follow me.”
It’s a fairly common request. A driver is asked to follow a friend or colleague’s vehicle in traffic — instead of relying on a navigation system or map — to reach an unfamiliar destination.
But is it safe? A new study, released by Arizona State University, concludes that it isn’t. The struggle to keep up with the lead vehicle often entices the driver to make poor driving decisions.
“We have found that when someone is asked to follow another vehicle, it can lead to them engaging in risky driving behavior, such as driving faster, making more erratic turns and following too close to the car in front,” explained Robert Gray, a human systems engineering professor who conducted the research with his team. “This is most likely caused by a fear of getting lost.”
The study, published in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, was originally inspired by an accident analysis that Gray performed for a court case. A driver in that case was seriously injured while trying to follow another vehicle.
For the study, Gray and his research team recruited students with a valid driver’s license to participate in a driving simulation. Initially, the students were asked to drive wherever they wanted in the simulated city. The exercise provided a baseline — a look at their basic driving behavior. Researchers compared these results to how the students drove when guided by a navigation system and when asked to “follow your friend in the car in front.”
The research team assessed each driver’s general speed, distance to the car in front, and lane changes. Also, the driving simulator presented some hazards to help researchers see whether driving behavior changed under different scenarios.
“We observed changes in behavior that increased the likelihood of being involved in an accident,” Gray said.
When drivers were “following a friend,” they drove faster and more erratically, closer to the car in front and made quicker lane changes, compared to when they drove under normal conditions or with a guided navigation system. In addition, when confronted with hazards in the following-a-friend simulation, the drivers were more likely to cut in front of a pedestrian crossing a road and speed through traffic lights turning red, according to the study.
“It is important to note that in our simulation, the leader and other vehicles around them did not break any laws, so the follower was not just copying the risky driving behavior they saw from someone else,” Gray pointed out.
By using a computerized driving simulation, the study eliminated the “contagious effect” in which driver behavior is influenced by surrounding traffic. Drivers often feel a social pressure to keep pace with traffic and run traffic lights when other vehicles do so.
What advice would Gray give drivers?
“If you are faced with this situation, get the address from the lead driver and use a map or navigation device so you know how to get there yourself,” Gray said. “In the future, we plan to investigate whether some knowledge about the location of the destination can get rid of these dangerous effects.”
Click here to download the study.
More Safety

Top 50 Executive Fleets
It is that time of year again! Time for the 2026 list of the Top 50 Executive Fleets, presented by Automotive Fleet and Volvo as part of its annual Fleet 500. Download now to see this year's list of companies!
Read More →How Better Visibility Cut Speeding Violations by 48%
Fleet leaders don't need more data, they need clearer visibility into what the data is saying. This case study explores how one utility replaced speeding-event counts with a single metric — miles driven in violation — to strengthen safety and significantly reduce speeding violations.
Read More →
Operation Safe Driver Week: Why the Industry's Oldest Safety Campaign Still Matters to Fleets
A look at how a 2007 enforcement initiative became one of the most consequential weeks on the fleet safety calendar, and what it means for your drivers in 2026.
Read More →
Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
The Two Biggest Summer Downtime Threats for Fleets
A conversation with a maintenance expert reveals the two most common summer maintenance pains and how to prevent them.
Read More →