MENU
SEARCHA new metric on the updated moderate overlap front crash test factors in both the position of the shoulder belt on the rear dummy’s chest and chest compression.
The new metric on the updated moderate overlap front crash test is called the chest index. It factors in both the position of the shoulder belt on the rear dummy’s chest and chest compression.
Photo: IIHS
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is rolling out new scoring criteria for one of its crash tests, leading crash test ratings on 13 vehicles to change.
The change is being made to the updated moderate overlap front crash test in order to better account for variations in the position of the rear shoulder belt.
It's important to note that these tests are geared toward the safety of second row passengers, which are not always present in fleet vehicles.
According to a news release from IIHS, the new metric on the crash test is called the chest index. It factors in both the position of the shoulder belt on the rear dummy’s chest and chest compression.
The belt position itself is also evaluated as part of the holistic analysis of how well the restraints control the motion of the dummy during the crash. Additionally, the range of shoulder belt positions considered acceptable has been expanded slightly.
“Most of these changes are part of a planned transition that we informed automakers we’d be making before we launched the updated test a year ago,” said Jessica Jermakian, IIHS vice president of vehicle research. “The new scoring eliminates an artificial benefit our initial ratings awarded for a high shoulder-belt position. Pressing ahead with a simpler program while we validated the new metric allowed us to start incentivizing vehicle improvements a year earlier.”
IIHS launched the updated moderate overlap front test in 2022 after research showed that in newer vehicles the risk of a fatal injury is now higher for belted occupants in the second row than for those in front.
That isn't because the second row has become less safe. Rather, the front seat has become safer due to improved airbags and advanced seat belts that are rarely available in the back.
In the updated test, a dummy the size of a small woman or 12-year-old child is positioned in the second row behind the driver dummy.
For a vehicle to earn a good rating, there can’t be an excessive risk of injury to the chest, among other body regions, as recorded by the second-row dummy.
During the initial year of testing, IIHS engineers estimated the risk of chest injuries with a device that records the seat belt tension and the dummy’s own chest deflection sensor — which measures how much the rib cage is compressed by the force of the crash.
To avoid delaying the launch of the program, engineers used a pressure mat to track the position of the shoulder belt and penalized vehicles when it exceeded a maximum height.
Vehicles with shoulder belts higher than the cutoff could receive no better than a marginal rating for chest injury risk, regardless how little chest deflection the dummy’s internal sensor recorded.
The new chest index takes into account both chest deflection and belt position, using a formula that the Institute has been validating for the past year to adjust the deflection metric based on distance of the shoulder belt from the internal sensor.
The pressure mat is still used to determine the maximum shoulder belt position during the crash. However, engineers now evaluate maximum belt position separately as part of their assessment of how well the restraints control the motion of the dummy during the test, which reduces the influence of shoulder belt height on the overall rating.
In addition, the cutoff for a belt that is too high has been raised by 10 mm in recognition of the need for shoulder belts to accommodate occupants of various sizes. These changes were not part of the original phase-in plan.
The belt tension metric, which makes it very difficult for a vehicle without technology like pretensioners and belt force limiters to earn a good rating, remains unchanged.
Previously published ratings in the updated moderate overlap test, which was launched in 2022, have been adjusted on the Institute’s website in conjunction with the announcement. The ratings of five vehicles improve, and eight receive downgrades.
Overal ratings for the following vehicles have been updated:
After taking into account the criteria changes, the crash test ratings of five vehicles improve, and eight receive downgrades.
Photo: Canva
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →
While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.
Read More →
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
Read More →
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
Read More →
More people on foot means more risk for drivers. These pedestrian safety tips can help prevent serious injuries and keep everyone safer on the road.
Read More →
Safer crews. Fewer incidents. Better uptime. Learn how driver-assist technology is changing the way vocational fleets operate.
Read More →
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
Read More →
