See Also: Jeep Wrangler Unsteady in IIHS Driver-Side Crash Test
Most Midsize Cars Falter in Updated IIHS Side Crash Test
Just three out of seven 2022 midsize cars earned good or acceptable ratings in an updated, more rigorous side crash test developed by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

To date, the 2022 Subaru Outback is the only midsize car to capture a good rating in a new side crash test conducted by IIHS engineers.
Photo: IIHS
Four out of seven 2022 midsize cars garnered marginal or poor ratings in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s (IIHS) updated side crash test. While the Honda Accord managed to roll away with a marginal score, the Toyota Camry, Nissan Altima, and Chevrolet Malibu all earned a poor rating.
On the upside, three cars performed relatively well when undergoing the rigorous evaluation. While the Subaru Outback is the only midsize car to earn a good rating, both the Hyundai Sonata and Volkswagen Jetta pulled in acceptable ratings due to somewhat higher levels of occupant compartment intrusion.
Noteworthy, all seven vehicles evaluated earned good ratings in the original IIHS side test. So why did these cars falter during the new side crash test?
IIHS engineers believe it could have to do with the fact that the vehicles — unlike SUVs, for example — sit lower to the ground. That means the striking barrier hits higher on the door panel, putting these cars at a disadvantage in this evaluation. However, the test reflects what happens in a real-world crash when midsize cars are struck by a higher-riding pickup or SUV.
There were significant reasons four of the cars did not fare well. For example, there was moderate intrusion of the B-pillar into the occupant compartment of the Accord. Injury measures for the driver’s pelvis were somewhat elevated, and the driver’s head moved downward past the side curtain airbag to contact the windowsill during the crash.
The Altima and Malibu showed substantial intrusion into the occupant compartment, but the safety cage of the Camry held up well. Injury measures indicated a high risk of torso and pelvis injuries for the driver in the Altima, a moderate risk of torso and pelvis injuries for the driver and high risk of pelvis injuries for the rear passenger in the Camry, and a high risk of head or neck injuries for the driver in the Malibu. In all three vehicles, the heads of either the driver or rear passenger dummy or both slipped below the side curtain airbag to contact the windowsill.
Conversely, risk of injuries was lower and less severe in the case of the three cars that earned higher ratings.
For instance, the head-protecting airbags for the driver and rear passenger performed well in the Outback, Sonata, and Jetta, contributing to a low risk of head and neck injuries for occupants in both seating positions. However, injury measures were somewhat elevated for the driver’s pelvis and rear passenger’s torso in the Jetta and the rear passenger’s pelvis in the Sonata.
IIHS developed the new test because research showed that many of the real-world side impacts that still account for nearly a quarter of passenger vehicle occupant fatalities are more severe than the original evaluation. Presently, the updated crash test is not included in the IIHS criteria for its Top Safety Pick awards program, but it will be in 2023.
More Safety
From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework
Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.
Read More →
Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk
Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.
Read More →
Coaching Is Not Training, Even When AI Is Doing It
AI-powered safety platforms can detect risky behaviors and deliver immediate feedback. But effective driver development still requires a foundation of training followed by coaching that reinforces those skills.
Read More →
How Emotions Behind the Wheel Can Affect Fleet Safety
During National Safety Month, fleets are encouraged to look beyond distracted driving and recognize how stress, fatigue, and emotional well-being influence driver performance and crash risk.
Read More →
Nominations Open for 2026 Fleet Safety Award
Nominations have officially opened for the 2026 Fleet Safety Award Winner.
Read More →
