Introduced in 2012, the small overlap front test replicates what happens when the front, driver-side corner of a vehicle collides with another vehicle or an object such as a tree or utility pole.
Photo: IIHS
2 min to read
The Ford Escape has measurably improved its performance in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s challenging small overlap front crash test — raising its rating from “poor” to “acceptable” in that test — thanks to structural changes to the 2017 model.
IIHS credited the test improvement to Ford’s decision to reinforce the driver door hinge pillar and modify the front-end structure.
Ad Loading...
When the 2013 model-year Escape underwent testing for small overlap protection, the structure didn’t hold up well. “Intrusion into the driver’s space reached 10 inches at the upper door hinge pillar,” IIHS said. “The dummy’s head barely contacted the frontal airbag before sliding off to the left, as the steering column moved right. The side curtain airbag lacked sufficient forward coverage to protect the head. Measures taken from the dummy showed injuries to the left hip would be likely and lower leg injuries would be possible.”
But in the small overlap test of the new model, maximum intrusion was reduced to 5 inches at the upper door hinge pillar. The side curtain air bag had enough forward coverage to protect the head.
“The dummy’s head hit the frontal airbag, though it began to slide off because the safety belt allowed the dummy to move too far forward,” IIHS said. “Measures taken from the dummy indicated a low risk of injuries.”
Introduced in 2012, the small overlap front test replicates what happens when the front, driver-side corner of a vehicle collides with another vehicle or an object such as a tree or utility pole.
In four other crashworthiness evaluations — moderate overlap front, side, roof strength, and head restraints and seats — the 2017 Ford Escape drew the highest possible rating of “good.” For front crash prevention, the car scored a “basic” rating for its optional equipment.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.