Study Compares Human Drivers and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies
A report from the University of Michigan assesses the strengths and weaknesses of human drivers and the various technologies used in self-driving cars.
by Staff
August 31, 2017
Photo of Waymo self-driving Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan courtesy of Fiat Chrysler.
2 min to read
Photo of Waymo self-driving Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan courtesy of Fiat Chrysler.
How do human driving skills — based on flesh-and-blood sensory perception, cognition and eye-hand coordination — measure up against autonomous vehicle technologies?
According to a new study, human drivers — when attentive, sober and well rested — still generally maintain an advantage in terms of reasoning, perception and sensing. But machines and computers are quite capable of performing tasks such as driving and have an edge in the areas of reaction time, power output and control, consistency and multichannel information processing.
Ad Loading...
The study, released by Sustainable Worldwide Transportation at the University of Michigan, offers a scientific take on the man-versus-machine driving debate. Human eyes, for example, are compared to autonomous vehicle radar, LIDAR and camera systems.
One advantage that people have is that their sensory powers are in a much more compact package.
“Matching (or exceeding) human sensing capabilities requires AVs [autonomous vehicles] to employ a variety of sensors, which in turn requires complete sensor fusion across the system, combining all sensor inputs to form a unified view of the surrounding roadway and environment,” the report noted. “While no single sensor completely equals human sensing capabilities, some offer capabilities not possible for a human driver (e.g., accurate distance measurement with lidar, seeing through inclement weather with radar.”
A fully connected autonomous vehicle — one that employs dedicated short-range communications, for example, to exchange data with other vehicles and infrastructure — offers the best potential to effectively and safely replace the human driver when operating vehicles at automation levels 4 (high automation) and 5 (full automation), according to the study.
Brandon Schoettle, a project manager at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute’s Human Factors Group, authored the report.
Ad Loading...
Below is a table summarizing some of his findings:
Performance aspect
Human
AV Radar
AV LIDAR
AV Camera
Connected vehicle with DSRC
Connected autonomous vehicle
Object detection
Good
Good
Good
Fair
n/a
Good
Object classification
Good
Poor
Fair
Good
n/a
Good
Distance estimation
Fair
Good
Good
Fair
Good
Good
Edge detection
Good
Poor
Good
Good
n/a
Good
Lane tracking
Good
Poor
Poor
Good
n/a
Good
Visibility range
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Good
Good
Poor weather performance
Fair
Good
Fair
Poor
Good
Good
Dark or low illumination performance
Poor
Good
Good
Fair
n/a
Good
Ability to communicate with other traffic and infrastructure
Poor
n/a
n/a
n/a
Good
Good
Source: “Sensor Fusion: A Comparison of Sensing Capabilities of Human Drivers and Highly Automated Vehicles,” released by Sustainable Worldwide Transportation at the University of Michigan. DSRC refers to dedicated short-range communications.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.