Study Compares Human Drivers and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies
A report from the University of Michigan assesses the strengths and weaknesses of human drivers and the various technologies used in self-driving cars.

Photo of Waymo self-driving Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan courtesy of Fiat Chrysler.

Photo of Waymo self-driving Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid minivan courtesy of Fiat Chrysler.
How do human driving skills — based on flesh-and-blood sensory perception, cognition and eye-hand coordination — measure up against autonomous vehicle technologies?
According to a new study, human drivers — when attentive, sober and well rested — still generally maintain an advantage in terms of reasoning, perception and sensing. But machines and computers are quite capable of performing tasks such as driving and have an edge in the areas of reaction time, power output and control, consistency and multichannel information processing.
The study, released by Sustainable Worldwide Transportation at the University of Michigan, offers a scientific take on the man-versus-machine driving debate. Human eyes, for example, are compared to autonomous vehicle radar, LIDAR and camera systems.
One advantage that people have is that their sensory powers are in a much more compact package.
“Matching (or exceeding) human sensing capabilities requires AVs [autonomous vehicles] to employ a variety of sensors, which in turn requires complete sensor fusion across the system, combining all sensor inputs to form a unified view of the surrounding roadway and environment,” the report noted. “While no single sensor completely equals human sensing capabilities, some offer capabilities not possible for a human driver (e.g., accurate distance measurement with lidar, seeing through inclement weather with radar.”
A fully connected autonomous vehicle — one that employs dedicated short-range communications, for example, to exchange data with other vehicles and infrastructure — offers the best potential to effectively and safely replace the human driver when operating vehicles at automation levels 4 (high automation) and 5 (full automation), according to the study.
Brandon Schoettle, a project manager at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute’s Human Factors Group, authored the report.
Below is a table summarizing some of his findings:
Performance aspect | Human | AV Radar | AV LIDAR | AV Camera | Connected vehicle with DSRC | Connected autonomous vehicle |
Object detection | Good | Good | Good | Fair | n/a | Good |
Object classification | Good | Poor | Fair | Good | n/a | Good |
Distance estimation | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | Good | Good |
Edge detection | Good | Poor | Good | Good | n/a | Good |
Lane tracking | Good | Poor | Poor | Good | n/a | Good |
Visibility range | Good | Good | Fair | Fair | Good | Good |
Poor weather performance | Fair | Good | Fair | Poor | Good | Good |
Dark or low illumination performance | Poor | Good | Good | Fair | n/a | Good |
Ability to communicate with other traffic and infrastructure | Poor | n/a | n/a | n/a | Good | Good |
Source: “Sensor Fusion: A Comparison of Sensing Capabilities of Human Drivers and Highly Automated Vehicles,” released by Sustainable Worldwide Transportation at the University of Michigan. DSRC refers to dedicated short-range communications.
More Safety

Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →
Don't Wait for a Crisis: 5 Ways to Build Mental Health Into Your Fleet Safety Program
For Suicide Prevention Month, fleet and safety leaders have an opportunity to put mental health where it belongs: at the center of workplace safety.
Read More →
How Camera Data Can Strengthen a Fleet’s Insurance Renewal
Insights from a commercial insurance carrier and a broker show how fleets can turn video telematic data, driver coaching, and improved claims results into a stronger case at insurance renewal.
Read More →
The Safest Fleets Aren’t the Ones with the Most Technology
You’ve made the telematics investment. Here’s how to capture the other half of its value and build the safest fleet on the road.
Read More →
Hidden in Plain Sight: Fleet Compliance Risks
Fleet compliance isn't just about having policies — it's about consistently enforcing them. This practical guide reveals six hidden compliance risks common in public sector and shared fleet operations and outlines proven strategies to improve visibility, accountability, and audit readiness
Read More →
NETS Sets 2026 Fleet Safety Benchmark Conference for Indianapolis
The Sept. 15–17 program will feature fleet benchmarking data, case studies, emerging technologies, and implementation strategies while running alongside the NSC Safety Congress & Expo.
Read More →
Off-the-Job Crashes Account for 43% of Employers’ $61.7 Billion Crash Burden
NETS quantifies costs dispersed across fleet, risk, HR, and other departments while providing new per-crash benchmarks for employers.
Read More →
Ram Recalls More Than 1.27 Million 1500 Pickups for Seat Belt Anchor Issue
The recall affects certain 2019-2026 Ram 1500 pickups that may have improperly attached second-row seat belt buckle anchors.
Read More →How Better Visibility Cut Speeding Violations by 48%
Fleet leaders don't need more data, they need clearer visibility into what the data is saying. This case study explores how one utility replaced speeding-event counts with a single metric — miles driven in violation — to strengthen safety and significantly reduce speeding violations.
Read More →
Operation Safe Driver Week: Why the Industry's Oldest Safety Campaign Still Matters to Fleets
A look at how a 2007 enforcement initiative became one of the most consequential weeks on the fleet safety calendar, and what it means for your drivers in 2026.
Read More →