The Governors Highway Safety Association and NHTSA release new guidelines for the collection of motor vehicle crash data.
by Staff
August 1, 2017
The Governors Highway Safety Association and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are encouraging states to adopt new guidelines for the collection motor vehicle crash data. Photo by Harui Lee/Wikimedia Commons.
2 min to read
The Governors Highway Safety Association and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are encouraging states to adopt new guidelines for the collection motor vehicle crash data. Photo by Harui Lee/Wikimedia Commons.
The Governors Highway Safety Association and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have jointly released new guidelines for the collection of motor vehicle crash data, in hopes of fostering more robust traffic safety research.
The updated guidelines reflect the “latest behavioral and technological changes impacting vehicles, drivers, and front-line data collectors,” GHSA said in a released statement.
Ad Loading...
These voluntary guidelines, embodied in the new edition of the "Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria" (MMUCC) report, identify a range of motor vehicle crash elements and characteristics. The guidelines are also intended to promote greater uniformity in collected crash data, so information can be more readily shared among organizations at the local, state and national levels.
“So much is changing on our roadways, and traffic fatalities are increasing at an alarming rate,” said Jonathan Adkins, GHSA executive director. “We need good data to make informed decisions about how to change driver behaviors and save more lives. GHSA strongly encourages states to align their crash records with MMUCC [Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria] and collect comprehensive, consistent data that is critical to pinpointing regional and national trends.”
In addition to GHSA and NHTSA, agencies contributing to the updated guidelines include the Federal Highway Administration, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board. Input was also solicited from state Departments of Transportation, local law enforcement agencies, safety advocacy groups, emergency medical service providers, researchers from the academic sector, and the general public.
In a released statement, the National Safety Council (NSC) praised the guidelines update and called the changes "long overdue." A previous NSC report found that 26 states lack fields on their crash reports to indicate whether a driver was texting, and 32 states lack fields to identify drug test results. Currently, no state is capturing information about whether a motor vehicle automation system was engaged at the time of the crash.
"Traffic safety professionals and organizations go where the data tell us to go, but we cannot concentrate our efforts or dedicate the right amount of resources if the data are incomplete," NSC said.
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
