Researchers Study Human Interaction With Automated Cars
The University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute is busy examining the human factor in automated driving, including how drivers respond when vehicle control is transferred back to them.

Photo of UMTRI's driving simulator lab courtesy of University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.

Photo of UMTRI's driving simulator lab courtesy of University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
Progress toward fully automated vehicles is happening rapidly, but many questions remain unanswered – particularly those related to human behavior.
“Some of the pressing issues are those related to human factors,” said Anuj K. Pradhan, part of the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute’s Young Driver Behavior and Injury Prevention Group. “Until vehicles are fully automated, 100-percent of the time, humans will still play an active and important role in the driving loop. So for automation levels 2 and 3, the human factor is critical.”
According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, a fully automated vehicle allowing unmanned operation is designated as level 4. In level 3, a vehicle essentially self-drives and controls all safety-critical functions, but certain situations might require transition back to driver control.
Level 2 automation represents combinations of multiple functions that enable a car to drive itself but require constant monitoring by the driver. The transitioning between automated and human control might be rapid.
These transitions may not be as simple as they sound.
“When you’re driving [normally], one is expected to possess a certain degree of situational awareness, especially with regard to the driving scene, traffic flow, and other driving related factors,” Pradhan explained. “But when a vehicle is in automated mode, the person inside may be reading, texting, or even napping. He or she may not be prepared to suddenly and safely take control of the vehicle when control is handed back from the automation.”
So the question for researchers is this: How can you safely and economically conduct empirical research to better understand the human-factor issues inherent in automated driving?
One approach is to perform vehicle testing in an off-roadway setting such as M City, the 32-acre testing facility located at the university’s north campus research complex. But since access to self-driving cars is very limited, even for research purposes, an alternate approach is to use high-fidelity driving simulators with automated-vehicle capabilities, such as the one at UMTRI.
The project has drawn seed funding from U-M’s Mobility Transformation Center (MTC) and secured an industrial partner, Realtime Technologies Inc.
Pradhan is working with programmer Christopher Atkins and lead electronics engineer Mark Gilbert to enhance UMTRI’s driving simulator to provide different levels of automated-driving capabilities. The software and hardware enhancements will provide for various customizations and experimental setups and designs. As a result, researchers can study human behavior in the context of automated driving with a high degree of validity.
When Pradhan pushes a small button on the steering wheel of UMTRI’s driving simulator, a voice announces, “Automated mode engaged.” The instrument cluster takes on a green background, and the car centers itself in the lane and cruises forward at a steady speed. The steering wheel turns by itself to keep the vehicle in the lane during curves and turns.
“The driving simulator, as is, is a very powerful and versatile tool that is used to study driver behavior," Pradhan said. "By adding self-driving capabilities, it allows us to significantly extend human-factors research on vehicle automation and to start examining a host of new questions that have been raised about vehicle automation in relation to the human driver or operator.”
Pradhan offered these examples of pertinent questions related to the transfer of vehicle control:
How do people react when control of the vehicle is transferred back to them from automation during different circumstances? How does this differ if the driver is already monitoring the roadway versus engaged in something else?
How do individual driver characteristics – such as age or experience – affect behaviors related to automation, including acceptance of technology and expectations of automation? Are alerts related to transfer of control best relayed by single or multiple modes (audio and seat vibrations) depending on the driver’s age or experience?
In a related project recently awarded by the MTC, Pradhan will examine these types of behavioral issues and gain a better understanding of the role that the driver’s state of attention plays during vehicle automation.
“It appears that when a human is in a self-driving car, it becomes important for the automation to also monitor the driver,” Pradhan noted. “That’s the next step.”
More Safety
How Better Visibility Cut Speeding Violations by 48%
Fleet leaders don't need more data, they need clearer visibility into what the data is saying. This case study explores how one utility replaced speeding-event counts with a single metric — miles driven in violation — to strengthen safety and significantly reduce speeding violations.
Read More →
Operation Safe Driver Week: Why the Industry's Oldest Safety Campaign Still Matters to Fleets
A look at how a 2007 enforcement initiative became one of the most consequential weeks on the fleet safety calendar, and what it means for your drivers in 2026.
Read More →
Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework
Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.
Read More →
Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk
Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.
Read More →
