Related: InterCore’s Driver Alertness Detection System Now Available
Ponzi Scheme Tied to Driver Alert Tech Firm
The Securities and Exchange Commission alleges that a Houston-area businessman deceived clients into investing in a financially troubled company specializing in safety tech aimed at preventing drowsy driving.

Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.

Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.
There’s no doubt evolving drowsy-driver detection and warning systems hold promise in preventing drowsy driving among fleet drivers. But the Securities and Exchange Commission alleges a Houston-area businessman exploited the lure of such life-saving technology to help attract investors into a $114 million Ponzi scheme.
In August, the SEC filed its case against Frederick Alan Voight in federal court in Houston. He’s charged with defrauding more than 300 investors in multiple offerings of promissory notes issued by two partnerships he owns, F.A. Voight & Associates LP and DayStar Funding LP. According to the SEC, Voight promised investors annual returns as high as 42-percent from loans to small public companies, including startup vehicle safety technology firm InterCore in Delray Beach, Fla.
But most of the funds went to pay earlier investors, the SEC alleges, and about $22 million is still unaccounted for. Voight is based in Richmond, Texas.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Voight raised $13.8 million from clients wishing to invest in deployment of InterCore’s Driver Alertness Detection System (DADS). Beginning in October 2014, Voight allegedly wrote to potential investors about a “tremendous” opportunity to help InterCore install the DADS technology into “several million trucks and buses.” Voight assured investors that InterCore was poised for a level of success that would pay the 30- to 42-percent annual interest rates on the promissory notes “many, many times over.”
“Voight wooed investors with promises of outsized returns and once-in-a-lifetime investment opportunities,” said David L. Peavler, acting regional co-director of the SEC’s Fort Worth regional office. “But, like all Ponzi schemes, we allege that this one collapsed when Voight couldn’t find enough new money to keep up with his false promises.”
The SEC complaint alleges that Voight knew the claims weren’t true because he served on InterCore’s board and was aware that the financially troubled company had no means to pay back the loans.
According to the SEC, Voight used funds from the DADS investors to make Ponzi payments to earlier investors. Some of the money, however, was funneled to InterCore through two of Voight’s partnerships, Rhine Partners LP and Topside Partners LP.
InterCore, in turn, sent the funds to its Montreal-based subsidiary, InterCore Research Canada, where the money “seemingly disappeared,” the SEC said.
By routing funds through Rhine and Topside, Voight garnered benefits, including fees and InterCore stock warrants, which he never disclosed to the DADS investors, the SEC alleged.
The SEC’s complaint charges Voight and DayStar with securities fraud and with conducting unregistered securities offerings. Voight and Daystar, without admitting guilt, agreed to settle the complaint by consenting to permanent injunctions against committing such violations in the future. Additionally, they agreed to asset freezes and other emergency relief, and to pay civil penalties and return investor funds with interest levels ultimately established by a court.
Voight also is barred from serving as a public company officer or director. He’s agreed to never participate in the offer, purchase or sale of any security, except for his own personal account, the SEC said.
The SEC named F.A. Voight & Associates, Rhine, Topside, InterCore, and InterCore Research Canada as relief defendants for the purpose of “recovering any allegedly ill-gotten gains they received from the fraud,” the commission said.
The SEC will litigate its claims against InterCore and InterCore Research. InterCore hasn't yet responded to a request for comment.
The SEC investigation was based out of the Fort Worth Office. Jeff Cohen, Keith Hunter and Jessica Magee conducted the probe.
More Safety

NAFA Fleet Safety Symposium to Collocate With 2026 Fleet Forward Conference
The daylong certificate program will precede the Fleet Forward Conference at the Gaylord National Harbor in Maryland.
Read More →
The Distractions You Can’t Turn Off: What Drivers Face Outside the Vehicle
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
FLASH Weather AI Launches First Deep-Learning Hail Prediction Model With High-Resolution Forecasting
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
How Coca-Cola United Protects Its Fleet from Growing Legal Risk
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
How to Speak the Same Language on Fleet Safety
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
Fleet Cybersecurity 101: What You Need from Your Technology Vendors
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →