Automotive Fleet
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Ponzi Scheme Tied to Driver Alert Tech Firm

The Securities and Exchange Commission alleges that a Houston-area businessman deceived clients into investing in a financially troubled company specializing in safety tech aimed at preventing drowsy driving.

by Staff
August 31, 2015
Ponzi Scheme Tied to Driver Alert Tech Firm

Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.

3 min to read


Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.

There’s no doubt evolving drowsy-driver detection and warning systems hold promise in preventing drowsy driving among fleet drivers. But the Securities and Exchange Commission alleges a Houston-area businessman exploited the lure of such life-saving technology to help attract investors into a $114 million Ponzi scheme

In August, the SEC filed its case against Frederick Alan Voight in federal court in Houston. He’s charged with defrauding more than 300 investors in multiple offerings of promissory notes issued by two partnerships he owns, F.A. Voight & Associates LP and DayStar Funding LP. According to the SEC, Voight promised investors annual returns as high as 42-percent from loans to small public companies, including startup vehicle safety technology firm InterCore in Delray Beach, Fla. 

Ad Loading...

But most of the funds went to pay earlier investors, the SEC alleges, and about $22 million is still unaccounted for. Voight is based in Richmond, Texas.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Voight raised $13.8 million from clients wishing to invest in deployment of InterCore’s Driver Alertness Detection System (DADS). Beginning in October 2014, Voight allegedly wrote to potential investors about a “tremendous” opportunity to help InterCore install the DADS technology into “several million trucks and buses.” Voight assured investors that InterCore was poised for a level of success that would pay the 30- to 42-percent annual interest rates on the promissory notes “many, many times over.”

“Voight wooed investors with promises of outsized returns and once-in-a-lifetime investment opportunities,” said David L. Peavler, acting regional co-director of the SEC’s Fort Worth regional office. “But, like all Ponzi schemes, we allege that this one collapsed when Voight couldn’t find enough new money to keep up with his false promises.”

The SEC complaint alleges that Voight knew the claims weren’t true because he served on InterCore’s board and was aware that the financially troubled company had no means to pay back the loans.

According to the SEC, Voight used funds from the DADS investors to make Ponzi payments to earlier investors. Some of the money, however, was funneled to InterCore through two of Voight’s partnerships, Rhine Partners LP and Topside Partners LP.

Ad Loading...

InterCore, in turn, sent the funds to its Montreal-based subsidiary, InterCore Research Canada, where the money “seemingly disappeared,” the SEC said.

By routing funds through Rhine and Topside, Voight garnered benefits, including fees and InterCore stock warrants, which he never disclosed to the DADS investors, the SEC alleged.

The SEC’s complaint charges Voight and DayStar with securities fraud and with conducting unregistered securities offerings. Voight and Daystar, without admitting guilt, agreed to settle the complaint by consenting to permanent injunctions against committing such violations in the future. Additionally, they agreed to asset freezes and other emergency relief, and to pay civil penalties and return investor funds with interest levels ultimately established by a court.

Voight also is barred from serving as a public company officer or director. He’s agreed to never participate in the offer, purchase or sale of any security, except for his own personal account, the SEC said.

The SEC named F.A. Voight & Associates, Rhine, Topside, InterCore, and InterCore Research Canada as relief defendants for the purpose of “recovering any allegedly ill-gotten gains they received from the fraud,” the commission said. 

Ad Loading...

The SEC will litigate its claims against InterCore and InterCore Research. InterCore hasn't yet responded to a request for comment.

The SEC investigation was based out of the Fort Worth Office. Jeff Cohen, Keith Hunter and Jessica Magee conducted the probe.

More Safety

Chris Brown sits across from safety experft at Lifesaver mobile in an interview about distracted driving and phone use tech.
Safetyby Chris BrownMay 1, 2026

Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel

Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 15, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2

As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 11, 2026

 Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash

What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Driver holding a phone while steering, illustrating distracted driving and the importance of mental awareness and attention on the road for fleet safety.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 10, 2026

From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers

Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.

Read More →
Safetyby StaffApril 8, 2026

Lytx 2026 Road Safety Report

While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.

Read More →
Driver’s hands on steering wheel in a sunlit vehicle, representing real-world driver behavior and the shift from data monitoring to hands-on training in fleet safety programs.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 7, 2026

Behind-the-Wheel vs. Classroom Training: What Actually Changes Driver Behavior?

Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A person in a car on their phone behind the steering wheel.
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 1, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 1

A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.

Read More →
Pedestrians crossing a busy street, highlighting the importance of driver awareness and caution to prevent pedestrian accidents.
Safetyby StaffMarch 30, 2026

Pedestrian Safety Starts With the Driver

More people on foot means more risk for drivers. These pedestrian safety tips can help prevent serious injuries and keep everyone safer on the road.

Read More →
SponsoredMarch 30, 2026

Safety by Design: Power and Protection in the Freightliner 114SD Plus

Safer crews. Fewer incidents. Better uptime. Learn how driver-assist technology is changing the way vocational fleets operate.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safetyby StaffMarch 26, 2026

Pedestrian Deaths Drop in First Half of 2025, Marking Largest Decline in Years

An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.

Read More →