Related: InterCore’s Driver Alertness Detection System Now Available
Ponzi Scheme Tied to Driver Alert Tech Firm
The Securities and Exchange Commission alleges that a Houston-area businessman deceived clients into investing in a financially troubled company specializing in safety tech aimed at preventing drowsy driving.

Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.

Screen shot from one of InterCore's promotional videos, via YouTube.
There’s no doubt evolving drowsy-driver detection and warning systems hold promise in preventing drowsy driving among fleet drivers. But the Securities and Exchange Commission alleges a Houston-area businessman exploited the lure of such life-saving technology to help attract investors into a $114 million Ponzi scheme.
In August, the SEC filed its case against Frederick Alan Voight in federal court in Houston. He’s charged with defrauding more than 300 investors in multiple offerings of promissory notes issued by two partnerships he owns, F.A. Voight & Associates LP and DayStar Funding LP. According to the SEC, Voight promised investors annual returns as high as 42-percent from loans to small public companies, including startup vehicle safety technology firm InterCore in Delray Beach, Fla.
But most of the funds went to pay earlier investors, the SEC alleges, and about $22 million is still unaccounted for. Voight is based in Richmond, Texas.
According to the SEC’s complaint, Voight raised $13.8 million from clients wishing to invest in deployment of InterCore’s Driver Alertness Detection System (DADS). Beginning in October 2014, Voight allegedly wrote to potential investors about a “tremendous” opportunity to help InterCore install the DADS technology into “several million trucks and buses.” Voight assured investors that InterCore was poised for a level of success that would pay the 30- to 42-percent annual interest rates on the promissory notes “many, many times over.”
“Voight wooed investors with promises of outsized returns and once-in-a-lifetime investment opportunities,” said David L. Peavler, acting regional co-director of the SEC’s Fort Worth regional office. “But, like all Ponzi schemes, we allege that this one collapsed when Voight couldn’t find enough new money to keep up with his false promises.”
The SEC complaint alleges that Voight knew the claims weren’t true because he served on InterCore’s board and was aware that the financially troubled company had no means to pay back the loans.
According to the SEC, Voight used funds from the DADS investors to make Ponzi payments to earlier investors. Some of the money, however, was funneled to InterCore through two of Voight’s partnerships, Rhine Partners LP and Topside Partners LP.
InterCore, in turn, sent the funds to its Montreal-based subsidiary, InterCore Research Canada, where the money “seemingly disappeared,” the SEC said.
By routing funds through Rhine and Topside, Voight garnered benefits, including fees and InterCore stock warrants, which he never disclosed to the DADS investors, the SEC alleged.
The SEC’s complaint charges Voight and DayStar with securities fraud and with conducting unregistered securities offerings. Voight and Daystar, without admitting guilt, agreed to settle the complaint by consenting to permanent injunctions against committing such violations in the future. Additionally, they agreed to asset freezes and other emergency relief, and to pay civil penalties and return investor funds with interest levels ultimately established by a court.
Voight also is barred from serving as a public company officer or director. He’s agreed to never participate in the offer, purchase or sale of any security, except for his own personal account, the SEC said.
The SEC named F.A. Voight & Associates, Rhine, Topside, InterCore, and InterCore Research Canada as relief defendants for the purpose of “recovering any allegedly ill-gotten gains they received from the fraud,” the commission said.
The SEC will litigate its claims against InterCore and InterCore Research. InterCore hasn't yet responded to a request for comment.
The SEC investigation was based out of the Fort Worth Office. Jeff Cohen, Keith Hunter and Jessica Magee conducted the probe.
More Safety

Top 50 Executive Fleets
It is that time of year again! Time for the 2026 list of the Top 50 Executive Fleets, presented by Automotive Fleet and Volvo as part of its annual Fleet 500. Download now to see this year's list of companies!
Read More →How Better Visibility Cut Speeding Violations by 48%
Fleet leaders don't need more data, they need clearer visibility into what the data is saying. This case study explores how one utility replaced speeding-event counts with a single metric — miles driven in violation — to strengthen safety and significantly reduce speeding violations.
Read More →
Operation Safe Driver Week: Why the Industry's Oldest Safety Campaign Still Matters to Fleets
A look at how a 2007 enforcement initiative became one of the most consequential weeks on the fleet safety calendar, and what it means for your drivers in 2026.
Read More →
Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
The Two Biggest Summer Downtime Threats for Fleets
A conversation with a maintenance expert reveals the two most common summer maintenance pains and how to prevent them.
Read More →