In small overlap front crash tests, the Chevrolet Equinox and its twin, the GMC Terrain, are the only 2014 model-year midsize SUVs out of nine evaluated to earn a “good” overall rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety announced.
The Toyota Highlander drew an “acceptable” overall rating. However, IIHS rated the Kia Sorento, Mazda CX-9 and Honda Pilot “poor” for small overlap protection. The Jeep Grand Cherokee, Toyota 4Runner and Ford Explorer were rated “marginal.”
Ad Loading...
The structure of the Chevrolet Equinox held up well, leaving adequate space for the driver. Photo courtesy of IIHS.
Because they bucked the trend and scored “good” overall ratings in the test, the Equinox and the Terrain qualify for IIHS’s highest award for 2014 -- Top Safety Pick+. The Toyota Highlander, whose “acceptable” small overlap rating was announced in December, also qualifies. The award is given to vehicles with a “good” or “acceptable” small overlap rating, “good” ratings in four other occupant protection tests, and a rating of “basic” or higher for front crash prevention.
IIHS noted that its small overlap front crash test continues to challenge manufacturers more than a year and a half after its introduction.
"SUVs have gotten much safer over the past few generations, but some are better than others at providing comprehensive front crash protection," said David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer. "When it comes to midsize SUVs, General Motors is showing the way forward. The Equinox and Terrain score well in all components of the small overlap test — structure, restraints and kinematics, and injury measures for four body regions."
The small overlap test replicates what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with another vehicle or an object such as a tree or utility pole. In the test, 25 percent of a vehicle's front end on the driver's side strikes a rigid barrier at 40 mph.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.