MENU
SEARCHOn average, older drivers removed their eyes and attention from the road for more than eight seconds longer than younger drivers, according to a new AAA study.
A new study from AAA looks at the use of infotainment systems by older and younger drivers.
Photo courtesy of AAA.
Drivers aged 55 to 75 took 4.7 to 8.6 seconds longer to complete tasks, experienced slower response times, and had increased visual distractions when interacting with in-vehicle infotainment systems as compared to drivers 21 to 36 years old, according to a new study.
The findings come from recent research conducted by the University of Utah in conjunction with the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety.
On average, older drivers removed their eyes and attention from the road for more than eight seconds longer than younger drivers. Yet taking one's eyes off the road for just two seconds doubles a driver's risk of getting into a crash, notes the AAA Foundation.
While the research involved drivers of passenger vehicles, the AAA Foundation says the results translate to commercial fleet drivers when using various technologies like voice-based or touchscreen features in the vehicle. The cognitive and visual demands created by these technologies extend the time that drivers have their eyes and attention off the road — posing a serious safety risk, especially for older drivers.
The new report examines driver response time when performing specific tasks related to infotainment systems.
While on average it took younger drivers 18 seconds to program audio entertainment, it took older drivers 25.4 seconds to complete the same task.
As for calling and dialing, younger drivers spent 17.7 seconds on average, but these tasks took older drivers 22.4 seconds.
Both younger and older drivers spent the longest amounts of time on text messaging and navigation entry. Specifically, it took younger drivers 27.7 seconds to send a text as compared with 33.8 seconds for older drivers.
Programming the navigation system required more than 31 seconds on the part of younger drivers, but demanded a full 40 seconds of time from older drivers.
Overall, the complex design of infotainment systems created increased visual and cognitive demand for older drivers. For example, some systems included multiple menus and cumbersome voice command functions that significantly reduced older drivers' ability to easily complete seemingly simple tasks.
The report also explores mode of interaction — for example, using a center stack display, center console, or auditory/vocal commands — and its impact on drivers.
Both older and younger drivers felt voice commands were less demanding to use than the center console or center stack controls. Yet tasks undertaken using auditory/vocal commands took the longest to complete, followed by center console controls. The center stack interactions were the shortest.
Older drivers took longer to complete tasks across all modes of interaction, regardless of how the task was completed. Finally, visual demand was higher for older drivers using all modes of interaction as compared to younger divers.
A total of 128 drivers ages 21 to 36 and 55 to 75 participated in the study with six 2018 model-year vehicles.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →
While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.
Read More →
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
Read More →
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
Read More →
More people on foot means more risk for drivers. These pedestrian safety tips can help prevent serious injuries and keep everyone safer on the road.
Read More →
Safer crews. Fewer incidents. Better uptime. Learn how driver-assist technology is changing the way vocational fleets operate.
Read More →
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
Read More →
