Automation Tech a Tougher Sell for Older Consumers
A new J.D. Power study finds that younger people are generally more trusting of the technologies that make self-driving vehicles possible.

Photo of self-driving car courtesy of Volvo.

Photo of self-driving car courtesy of Volvo.
Trust in automation technology — a critical step for the future of self-driving vehicles — is much higher among younger consumers than their older counterparts, a new J.D. Power study concluded.
The study also found that consumers are most interested in a number of automotive technology features that make use of the underpinnings of fully automated vehicles, such as radar, sensors, light detection and ranging (LIDAR), and cameras. Features with high consumer interest include smart headlights, night vision, lane change assist, traffic jam assist, medical emergency stop, smart intersection, and predictive vehicle control.
But when it comes to making the leap to fully automated cars, trust in the technology is directly linked to the age of the consumer, according to the study.
For the purposes of the study, researchers divided consumers into five age groups: Pre-Boomers (born before 1946), Baby Boomers (born 1946-1964), Gen X (1965-1976), Gen Y (1977-1994), and Gen Z (1995-2000).
More than half of Gen Y (56%) and Gen Z (55%) vehicle owners said they trust self-driving technology, compared with 41% of Gen X, 23% of Baby Boomers, and 18% of Pre-Boomers.
Further, only 27% of Gen X, 18% of Gen Y, and 11% of Gen Z consumers said they “definitely would not” trust the technology, while 39% of Baby Boomers and 40% of Pre-Boomers said the same.
The one view all generations share is a concern for technology security, specifically surrounding privacy and the potential for systems to be hacked, hijacked, or to crash --either the vehicle or the system itself.
“The level of trust is directly linked to the level of interest in a new technology among automobile buyers,” said Kristin Kolodge, executive director of driver interaction and human machine interface (HMI) research at J.D. Power. “Acceptance can be increased with exposure over time and experience with automated technologies. But trust is fragile and can be broken if there is an excessive number of incidents with automated vehicles.”
Gen Y and Gen Z vehicle owners are twice as likely as Gen X members and five times as likely as Boomers and Pre-Boomers to show interest in certain alternative mobility types, such as mobility sharing/co-ownership, journey-based ownership, and mobility on demand, according to the study.
Furthermore, the study found that 59% of Gen Y vehicle owners said they are “definitely” or “probably” interested in fully automated vehicles, and 32% of them would pay $3,000 or more for the technology. Among the four alternative mobility types, interest levels are highest among all generations for unmanned mobility.
To download the study, click here.
More Safety

Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework
Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.
Read More →
Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk
Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.
Read More →
Coaching Is Not Training, Even When AI Is Doing It
AI-powered safety platforms can detect risky behaviors and deliver immediate feedback. But effective driver development still requires a foundation of training followed by coaching that reinforces those skills.
Read More →
How Emotions Behind the Wheel Can Affect Fleet Safety
During National Safety Month, fleets are encouraged to look beyond distracted driving and recognize how stress, fatigue, and emotional well-being influence driver performance and crash risk.
Read More →
