AAA tests underscore performance differences between systems designed to mitigate crash severity and systems designed to prevent a crash altogether whenever possible.
by Staff
August 25, 2016
Graphic courtesy of AAA.
4 min to read
Graphic courtesy of AAA.
New test results from AAA reveal that automatic emergency braking systems — the safety technology that will soon be standard equipment on 99% of vehicles — vary widely in design and performance.
All the systems tested by AAA are designed to apply the brakes when a driver fails to engage them. But those that are designed to prevent crashes reduced vehicle speeds by nearly twice that of those designed to lessen crash severity, according to AAA.
Ad Loading...
While any reduction in speed offers a significant safety benefit to drivers, AAA warns that automatic braking systems are not all designed to prevent collisions and recommends that drivers fully understand system limitations before getting behind the wheel.
“AAA found that two-thirds of Americans familiar with the technology believe that automatic emergency braking systems are designed to avoid crashes without driver intervention,” said John Nielsen, AAA’s managing director of automotive engineering and repair. “The reality is that today’s systems vary greatly in performance, and many are not designed to stop a moving car.”
In partnership with the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center, AAA evaluated five 2016 model-year vehicles equipped with automatic emergency braking systems. Researchers looked at performance within system limitations and in real-world driving scenarios designed to push the technology’s limits.
Researchers tested and compared systems based on the capabilities and limitations stated in the owner’s manuals. Systems fell into two categories — those designed to slow or stop the vehicle enough to prevent crashes, and those designed to slow the vehicle to lessen crash severity. More than 70 trials were conducted.
In terms of overall speed reduction, the systems designed to prevent crashes reduced vehicle speeds by twice that of systems designed to only lessen crash severity (79% speed reduction vs. 40% speed reduction), according to AAA. With speed differentials of under 30 mph, systems designed to prevent crashes successfully avoided collisions in 60% of test scenarios. Surprisingly, the systems designed to only lessen crash severity were able to completely avoid crashes in nearly one-third (33%) of test scenarios.
Ad Loading...
AAA conducted testing of automatic emergency braking systems on a closed course at the Auto Club Speedway in Fontana, Calif. Photo courtesy of AAA.
When pushed beyond stated system limitations and proposed federal requirements, the variation among systems became more pronounced, researchers discovered. When traveling at 45 mph and approaching a static vehicle, the systems designed to prevent crashes reduced speeds by 74% overall and avoided crashes in 40% of scenarios. In contrast, systems designed to lessen crash severity were only able to reduce vehicle speed by 9% overall, AAA reported.
“Automatic emergency braking systems have the potential to drastically reduce the risk of injury from a crash,” said Megan McKernan, manager of the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center. “When traveling at 30 mph, a speed reduction of just 10 mph can reduce the energy of crash impact by more than 50 percent.”
In addition to the independent testing, AAA surveyed U.S. drivers to gauge attitudes about the technology. Survey results revealed that 9% of U.S. drivers currently have automatic emergency braking on their vehicle. Nearly 40% percent of drivers want automatic emergency braking on their next vehicle.
The survey also found that men are more likely to want an automatic emergency braking system in their next vehicle (42%) than female drivers (35%). Two out of five U.S. drivers trust automatic emergency braking to work. Additionally, drivers who currently own a vehicle equipped with such a braking system are more likely to trust it to work (71%) compared to drivers who have no experience with the technology (41%).
“When shopping for a new vehicle, AAA recommends considering one equipped with an automatic emergency braking system,” Nielsen said. But he cautioned drivers to fully understand their vehicle’s capabilities and limitations before hitting the road.
Ad Loading...
For the technology’s potential to reduce crash severity, 20 automakers representing 99% of vehicle sales have committed to making automatic emergency braking systems standard on all new vehicles by 2022. The U.S. Department of Transportation said this voluntary agreement will make the safety feature available on new cars up to three years sooner than could be achieved through the formal regulatory process.
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, rear-end collisions, which automatic emergency braking systems are designed to mitigate, result in nearly 2,000 fatalities and more than 500,000 injuries annually. Currently, 10% of new vehicles have automatic emergency braking as standard equipment, and more than half of new vehicles offer the feature as an option.
AAA conducted its testing of automatic emergency braking systems on a closed course at the Auto Club Speedway in Fontana, Calif. Testers used instrumented vehicles and a robotic “soft car” that allowed for collisions without vehicle damage. This permitted AAA to collect vehicle separation, speed, and deceleration data in a variety of crash scenarios designed to mirror real-world driving conditions.
The testing was designed to build on previous research by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.