Automotive Fleet
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Automatic Emergency Braking Systems Vary Widely

AAA tests underscore performance differences between systems designed to mitigate crash severity and systems designed to prevent a crash altogether whenever possible.

by Staff
August 25, 2016
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems Vary Widely

Graphic courtesy of AAA.

4 min to read


Graphic courtesy of AAA.

New test results from AAA reveal that automatic emergency braking systems — the safety technology that will soon be standard equipment on 99% of vehicles — vary widely in design and performance.

All the systems tested by AAA are designed to apply the brakes when a driver fails to engage them. But those that are designed to prevent crashes reduced vehicle speeds by nearly twice that of those designed to lessen crash severity, according to AAA.

Ad Loading...

While any reduction in speed offers a significant safety benefit to drivers, AAA warns that automatic braking systems are not all designed to prevent collisions and recommends that drivers fully understand system limitations before getting behind the wheel.

“AAA found that two-thirds of Americans familiar with the technology believe that automatic emergency braking systems are designed to avoid crashes without driver intervention,” said John Nielsen, AAA’s managing director of automotive engineering and repair. “The reality is that today’s systems vary greatly in performance, and many are not designed to stop a moving car.”

In partnership with the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center, AAA evaluated five 2016 model-year vehicles equipped with automatic emergency braking systems. Researchers looked at performance within system limitations and in real-world driving scenarios designed to push the technology’s limits.

Researchers tested and compared systems based on the capabilities and limitations stated in the owner’s manuals. Systems fell into two categories — those designed to slow or stop the vehicle enough to prevent crashes, and those designed to slow the vehicle to lessen crash severity. More than 70 trials were conducted.

In terms of overall speed reduction, the systems designed to prevent crashes reduced vehicle speeds by twice that of systems designed to only lessen crash severity (79% speed reduction vs. 40% speed reduction), according to AAA. With speed differentials of under 30 mph, systems designed to prevent crashes successfully avoided collisions in 60% of test scenarios. Surprisingly, the systems designed to only lessen crash severity were able to completely avoid crashes in nearly one-third (33%) of test scenarios.

Ad Loading...

AAA conducted testing of automatic emergency braking systems on a closed course at the Auto Club Speedway in Fontana, Calif. Photo courtesy of AAA.

When pushed beyond stated system limitations and proposed federal requirements, the variation among systems became more pronounced, researchers discovered. When traveling at 45 mph and approaching a static vehicle, the systems designed to prevent crashes reduced speeds by 74% overall and avoided crashes in 40% of scenarios. In contrast, systems designed to lessen crash severity were only able to reduce vehicle speed by 9% overall, AAA reported.

“Automatic emergency braking systems have the potential to drastically reduce the risk of injury from a crash,” said Megan McKernan, manager of the Automobile Club of Southern California’s Automotive Research Center. “When traveling at 30 mph, a speed reduction of just 10 mph can reduce the energy of crash impact by more than 50 percent.”

In addition to the independent testing, AAA surveyed U.S. drivers to gauge attitudes about the technology. Survey results revealed that 9% of U.S. drivers currently have automatic emergency braking on their vehicle. Nearly 40% percent of drivers want automatic emergency braking on their next vehicle.

The survey also found that men are more likely to want an automatic emergency braking system in their next vehicle (42%) than female drivers (35%). Two out of five U.S. drivers trust automatic emergency braking to work. Additionally, drivers who currently own a vehicle equipped with such a braking system are more likely to trust it to work (71%) compared to drivers who have no experience with the technology (41%).

“When shopping for a new vehicle, AAA recommends considering one equipped with an automatic emergency braking system,” Nielsen said. But he cautioned drivers to fully understand their vehicle’s capabilities and limitations before hitting the road.

Ad Loading...

For the technology’s potential to reduce crash severity, 20 automakers representing 99% of vehicle sales have committed to making automatic emergency braking systems standard on all new vehicles by 2022. The U.S. Department of Transportation said this voluntary agreement will make the safety feature available on new cars up to three years sooner than could be achieved through the formal regulatory process.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, rear-end collisions, which automatic emergency braking systems are designed to mitigate, result in nearly 2,000 fatalities and more than 500,000 injuries annually. Currently, 10% of new vehicles have automatic emergency braking as standard equipment, and more than half of new vehicles offer the feature as an option.

AAA conducted its testing of automatic emergency braking systems on a closed course at the Auto Club Speedway in Fontana, Calif. Testers used instrumented vehicles and a robotic “soft car” that allowed for collisions without vehicle damage. This permitted AAA to collect vehicle separation, speed, and deceleration data in a variety of crash scenarios designed to mirror real-world driving conditions.

The testing was designed to build on previous research by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety.

More Safety

Nexar and nauto logos
Safetyby StaffJuly 13, 2026

Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset

Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.

Read More →
A black square with white color font text
SafetyJuly 2, 2026

From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets

From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.

Read More →
IIHS HLDI text overlaid on the trunks of pick up trucks.
Safetyby Chris BrownJuly 2, 2026

IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A blue and white Automotive Fleet podcast logo
SafetyJuly 1, 2026

Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel

Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.

Read More →
Two people sit across from each other at a desk during a business meeting. One person, wearing a white shirt, has their hands folded while the other gestures with a pen toward documents clipped to a clipboard. Additional paperwork and a calculator are visible on the table, suggesting a discussion involving contracts, finances, or administrative paperwork. Sunlight filters through window blinds in the background, creating a professional office setting.
SponsoredJuly 1, 2026

Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)

Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab

Read More →
An Automotive Fleet podcast thumbnail
SafetyJune 26, 2026

How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety

This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Ambulance and damaged car at a crash scene on a rainy roadway, illustrating workplace transportation risks and the growing focus on road safety management for fleets.
SafetyJune 16, 2026

Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework

Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.

Read More →
Close-up of a Jeep Wrangler front grille and headlight with text noting Stellantis’ recall of 1.3 million Jeep vehicles worldwide over a potential fire risk tied to power steering wiring.
Safetyby StaffJune 10, 2026

Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk

Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.

Read More →
Road signs pointing to “Safe” and “Risky” beside a glowing AI network graphic, illustrating the role of artificial intelligence in driver safety, coaching, training, and risk management.
SafetyJune 10, 2026

Coaching Is Not Training, Even When AI Is Doing It

AI-powered safety platforms can detect risky behaviors and deliver immediate feedback. But effective driver development still requires a foundation of training followed by coaching that reinforces those skills.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Driver resting in a vehicle seat, illustrating the dangers of fatigue and the importance of driver wellness, rest, and alertness for safe fleet and roadway operations.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyJune 9, 2026

How Emotions Behind the Wheel Can Affect Fleet Safety

During National Safety Month, fleets are encouraged to look beyond distracted driving and recognize how stress, fatigue, and emotional well-being influence driver performance and crash risk.

Read More →