Related: IIHS to Rate Automatic Braking Systems for Pedestrian Detection
Automatic Braking Study to Identify More Benefits of the Tech
Although automatic emergency brake systems have proven to prevent typical front-to-rear crashes, a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is exploring additional opportunities to increase the effectiveness of the technology.

A new IIHS study will look at how automatic braking technology can be improved to maximize its benefits.
Photo via Ford/Wikimedia.
Although automatic emergency brake systems have proven to prevent typical front-to-rear crashes — reducing rates of rear-end crashes by 50% and rear-end crashes involving injuries by 56% — a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is exploring additional opportunities to increase the effectiveness of the technology.
The findings indicate that extending the functionality of automatic braking to address less common types of rear-end crashes such as those involving turning, changing lanes or striking heavy trucks or motorcycles would help maximize the benefits of the technology.
In fact, IIHS estimates that automatic braking could potentially prevent as many as 70% of front-to-rear crashes involving passenger vehicles as striking vehicles and 20% of all passenger vehicle crashes reported to police.
To determine what types of rear-end crashes in which vehicles with automatic braking are involved, IIHS examined police crash reporting data from 23 states during 2009 to 2016 for striking passenger vehicles with and without autobrake among models on which the system was optional.
Many of the crashes during the study period involved typical scenarios that current autobrake systems already address.
For example, over two-thirds of the crashes happened when the road surface was dry, the striking vehicle was moving straight, or the vehicle hit was slowing or stopped. More than 50% of crashes occurred at speed limits of 45 mph or below, and about half of the vehicles struck were cars.
The remainder of the crashes studied involved less-typical situations.
For example, vehicles with the systems that are involved in crashes were more likely to be turning or to strike a vehicle that was turning or changing lanes. In some cases, the vehicle struck a non-passenger vehicle or special-use vehicle such as a medium- or heavy-duty truck or motorcycle. Other atypical situations involving vehicles with automatic braking included crashes on a snowy or icy road, or on a road with a speed limit of 70 mph or higher.
The findings indicate that designers of autobrake to date have focused on creating technology that addresses the most common types of collisions.
Going forward, IIHS believes there's a clear need for automatic braking systems that reliably detect other vehicles.
For example, a 2017 IIHS research report suggests that automatic braking could prevent up to 13% of passenger vehicle crashes with motorcycles. Systems that reliably detect large trucks could prevent underride crashes.
More Safety

Tips for Driving Safely on Halloween Night
This video features a reminder from the Connecticut Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Connecticut Police Chiefs Association, urging drivers to prioritize safety this Halloween.
Read More →
IIHS Crash Avoidance Tests Reveal Safety Gaps in Cargo Vans and Work Trucks
New IIHS crash avoidance ratings show uneven performance among cargo vans and heavy-duty pickups, with most struggling to avoid vehicle-to-vehicle collisions.
Read More →
What’s Next for Fleet? Safety, AI & Industry Recognition | AF News Recap
Could your company's culture be encouraging distracted driving? This week, we're exploring how workplace expectations affect driver safety, what AI, EVs, and autonomous vehicles could mean for the future of fleet management, and how fleet professionals can strengthen their award nominations.
Read More →
Does Your Fleet's Culture Encourage Distracted Driving?
What happens when the people responsible for enforcing safety rules are the ones setting the wrong example? The answer may reveal why some of the biggest risks to fleet drivers have little to do with what's written in the employee handbook.
Read More →
Fleet Manager’s Ultimate Playbook: Navigating the New Standard in OEM Connectivity
Rising operating costs, driver safety concerns, and unplanned downtime are putting unprecedented pressure on modern fleets. Discover how fleet managers use embedded OEM connectivity and real-time vehicle data to cut TCO, prevent downtime, and protect drivers without aftermarket telematics hardware.
Read More →
From Driver Well-Being to EV Charging | AF News Recap
Mental health belongs in the fleet safety conversation. This week, we’re looking at five ways fleets can support employee well-being before a crisis, plus Holman’s expansion in Mexico, new one-day Fleet Forward passes, and why EV charging demand is outpacing infrastructure growth.
Read More →
Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →
Don't Wait for a Crisis: 5 Ways to Build Mental Health Into Your Fleet Safety Program
For Suicide Prevention Month, fleet and safety leaders have an opportunity to put mental health where it belongs: at the center of workplace safety.
Read More →
How Camera Data Can Strengthen a Fleet’s Insurance Renewal
Insights from a commercial insurance carrier and a broker show how fleets can turn video telematic data, driver coaching, and improved claims results into a stronger case at insurance renewal.
Read More →
The Safest Fleets Aren’t the Ones with the Most Technology
You’ve made the telematics investment. Here’s how to capture the other half of its value and build the safest fleet on the road.
Read More →