Related: IIHS to Rate Automatic Braking Systems for Pedestrian Detection
Automatic Braking Study to Identify More Benefits of the Tech
Although automatic emergency brake systems have proven to prevent typical front-to-rear crashes, a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is exploring additional opportunities to increase the effectiveness of the technology.

A new IIHS study will look at how automatic braking technology can be improved to maximize its benefits.
Photo via Ford/Wikimedia.
Although automatic emergency brake systems have proven to prevent typical front-to-rear crashes — reducing rates of rear-end crashes by 50% and rear-end crashes involving injuries by 56% — a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety is exploring additional opportunities to increase the effectiveness of the technology.
The findings indicate that extending the functionality of automatic braking to address less common types of rear-end crashes such as those involving turning, changing lanes or striking heavy trucks or motorcycles would help maximize the benefits of the technology.
In fact, IIHS estimates that automatic braking could potentially prevent as many as 70% of front-to-rear crashes involving passenger vehicles as striking vehicles and 20% of all passenger vehicle crashes reported to police.
To determine what types of rear-end crashes in which vehicles with automatic braking are involved, IIHS examined police crash reporting data from 23 states during 2009 to 2016 for striking passenger vehicles with and without autobrake among models on which the system was optional.
Many of the crashes during the study period involved typical scenarios that current autobrake systems already address.
For example, over two-thirds of the crashes happened when the road surface was dry, the striking vehicle was moving straight, or the vehicle hit was slowing or stopped. More than 50% of crashes occurred at speed limits of 45 mph or below, and about half of the vehicles struck were cars.
The remainder of the crashes studied involved less-typical situations.
For example, vehicles with the systems that are involved in crashes were more likely to be turning or to strike a vehicle that was turning or changing lanes. In some cases, the vehicle struck a non-passenger vehicle or special-use vehicle such as a medium- or heavy-duty truck or motorcycle. Other atypical situations involving vehicles with automatic braking included crashes on a snowy or icy road, or on a road with a speed limit of 70 mph or higher.
The findings indicate that designers of autobrake to date have focused on creating technology that addresses the most common types of collisions.
Going forward, IIHS believes there's a clear need for automatic braking systems that reliably detect other vehicles.
For example, a 2017 IIHS research report suggests that automatic braking could prevent up to 13% of passenger vehicle crashes with motorcycles. Systems that reliably detect large trucks could prevent underride crashes.
More Safety

How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework
Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.
Read More →
Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk
Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.
Read More →
Coaching Is Not Training, Even When AI Is Doing It
AI-powered safety platforms can detect risky behaviors and deliver immediate feedback. But effective driver development still requires a foundation of training followed by coaching that reinforces those skills.
Read More →
How Emotions Behind the Wheel Can Affect Fleet Safety
During National Safety Month, fleets are encouraged to look beyond distracted driving and recognize how stress, fatigue, and emotional well-being influence driver performance and crash risk.
Read More →
Nominations Open for 2026 Fleet Safety Award
Nominations have officially opened for the 2026 Fleet Safety Award Winner.
Read More →
Turning Connected Vehicle Data Into Decisions That Matter
Fleet leaders have more data than ever, but turning that data into clear, actionable decisions remains a challenge. This white paper shows how leading organizations are using connected vehicle data to improve safety, reduce costs, and optimize fleet performance. Learn how to turn insight into action across your fleet.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-time Prevention
Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Learn more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab.
Read More →
NAFA Fleet Safety Symposium to Collocate With 2026 Fleet Forward Conference
The daylong certificate program will precede the Fleet Forward Conference at the Gaylord National Harbor in Maryland.
Read More →
The Distractions You Can’t Turn Off: What Drivers Face Outside the Vehicle
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
