Automotive Fleet
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Argo AI Launches AV Safety Guidelines to Curb Crashes with Bicyclists

In 2020, traffic fatalities of cyclists increased 5% in the U.S. Developers of self-driving technology can do their part to reduce collisions by following new safety guidance.

December 13, 2021
Argo AI Launches AV Safety Guidelines to Curb Crashes with Bicyclists

New technical guidelines from Argo AI aim to help developers of self-driving systems design technology that keeps vulnerable bicyclists safer.

Photo via pexels.com/Samson Katt

3 min to read


Argo AI, a global autonomous vehicle technology platform company, in partnership with the League of American Bicyclists, has developed and launched technical guidelines to ensure safe interactions between autonomous vehicles (AVs) and cyclists.

The new technical guidelines deliver on Argo AI’s commitment to developing a self-driving system that is trusted by cyclists and enhances the safety of the communities in which they operate, according to the company.

Ad Loading...

In the U.S., traffic fatalities of cyclists increased 5% in 2020 over 2019, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Keeping these vulnerable road users safe has long been a challenge. With AVs entering our roadways, the challenge is even greater.

Teaming up with the League of American Bicyclists, Argo AI has created a safety blueprint designed to reduce the risk of an autonomous vehicle hitting a cyclist. The partners outlined six technical guidelines for the manner in which a self-driving system (SDS) should accurately detect cyclists, predict cyclist behavior, and drive in a consistent way to effectively and safely share the road.

The first concerns perception. An SDS should designate cyclists as a core object representation within its perception system in order to detect cyclists accurately as opposed to pedestrians, for example. By treating cyclists as a distinct class and labeling a diverse set of bicycle imagery, a self-driving system detects cyclists in a variety of positions and orientations, from a variety of viewpoints, and at a variety of speeds.

Secondly, a system should be built to predict typical cyclist behavior. For example, a cyclist may lane split, yield at stop signs, walk a bicycle, or make quick, deliberate lateral movements to avoid obstacles. Understanding of potential cyclist movement patterns is necessary to best predict their intentions and prepare the self-driving vehicle’s actions.

Ad Loading...

The third guideline aims to incorporate an understanding of cycling infrastructure. A self-driving system should use high definition 3D maps that incorporate details about cycling infrastructure, like where dedicated bike lanes are located, and include all local and state cycling laws to ensure its self-driving system is compliant. Accounting for bike infrastructure enables the SDS to anticipate cyclists and to maintain a safe distance between the self-driving vehicle and the bike lane.

The fourth point says that an SDS should drive in a consistent and understandable manner. Developers should aim for the technology to operate in a naturalistic way so that the intentions of autonomous vehicles are clearly understood by other road users. In the presence of nearby cyclists or when passing or driving behind cyclists, an SDS should target appropriate speeds in accordance with local speed limits, and margins that are equal to or greater than local laws, and only pass a cyclist when it can maintain those margins and speeds for the entire maneuver.

The fifth guideline recommends an SDS prepare for uncertain situations and proactively slow down. A self-driving system should account for uncertainty in cyclists’ intent, direction, and speed — for instance reducing vehicle speed when a cyclist is traveling in the opposite direction of the vehicle in the same lane. When there is uncertainty, the self-driving system should lower the vehicle’s speed and, when possible, increase the margin of distance.

Finally, the new recommendations say there should be a focus on testing of cyclist scenarios. Developers of self-driving technology should be committed to continuous virtual and physical testing of its self-driving system with a specific focus on cyclist safety in all phases of development. This can include both virtual and physical testing.

Some 846 bicyclists in the U.S. lost their lives in 2019 alone, according to NHTSA.

More Safety

Chris Brown sits across from safety experft at Lifesaver mobile in an interview about distracted driving and phone use tech.
Safetyby Chris BrownMay 1, 2026

Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel

Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 15, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2

As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 11, 2026

 Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash

What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Driver holding a phone while steering, illustrating distracted driving and the importance of mental awareness and attention on the road for fleet safety.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 10, 2026

From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers

Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.

Read More →
Safetyby StaffApril 8, 2026

Lytx 2026 Road Safety Report

While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.

Read More →
Driver’s hands on steering wheel in a sunlit vehicle, representing real-world driver behavior and the shift from data monitoring to hands-on training in fleet safety programs.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 7, 2026

Behind-the-Wheel vs. Classroom Training: What Actually Changes Driver Behavior?

Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A person in a car on their phone behind the steering wheel.
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 1, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 1

A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.

Read More →
Pedestrians crossing a busy street, highlighting the importance of driver awareness and caution to prevent pedestrian accidents.
Safetyby StaffMarch 30, 2026

Pedestrian Safety Starts With the Driver

More people on foot means more risk for drivers. These pedestrian safety tips can help prevent serious injuries and keep everyone safer on the road.

Read More →
SponsoredMarch 30, 2026

Safety by Design: Power and Protection in the Freightliner 114SD Plus

Safer crews. Fewer incidents. Better uptime. Learn how driver-assist technology is changing the way vocational fleets operate.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safetyby StaffMarch 26, 2026

Pedestrian Deaths Drop in First Half of 2025, Marking Largest Decline in Years

An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.

Read More →