Automotive Fleet
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

State-Enforced Distraced Driving Laws on the Rise

Enforcing stricter distracted driving laws has become a top priority for states across the nation, as many are beginning to re-evaluate state crash data statistics and perform distracted driving studies.

by Jennifer Washington
November 18, 2010
5 min to read


Every day, between 4,000 and 8,000 crashes related to distracted driving occur in the United States. Despite the record drop in the 2009 national highway fatality rate, crashes in which distracted driving played a role are increasing, according to American Automobile Association (AAA) data. These types of collisions account for as many as half of the six million crashes reported in the U.S. annually, resulting in state initiatives to discourage the use of handheld devices while driving.    

Though cell phones are among the top distractions for drivers, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) includes eating, drinking, talking to passengers, interaction with in-car technologies, and use of portable electronic devices under secondary task involvement.

Drivers who use mobile phones while driving were four times more likely to crash than drivers who were not, a rate equal to that of driving while under the influence at 20 percent above the current nationwide 0.08 limit, according to a study from the New England Journal of Medicine.

However, studies show hands-free devices are not necessarily risk-free and distract drivers as much as handheld phones. The argument states it is the conversation that distracts the driver, not the handheld device.

States Quickly Adopting Legislation

State-proposed laws that target distracted driving are materializing quickly, with 11 laws taking effect in 2010 alone. State governments are quickly drafting new legislation to help deter the rising number of distracted driving-related crashes.

According to Federal Highway Administration (FHA) data, the 8.9 percent highway fatality rate drop is the lowest on record, showing that nationwide efforts such as the "Click it or Ticket" campaign may have proved beneficial. Increased awareness about the dangers of common distractions while driving might also help the fatality rate continue to drop in the future.

Primary laws that ban handheld cell phones for all drivers are currently enforced in California, Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Washington, and the District of Columbia. Delaware has signed similar legislation, effective Jan. 2, 2011.

Maryland enforces a secondary law that bans handheld cell phone use while driving. Utah has a secondary law under the broader term "careless driving," against committing a moving violation (other than speeding) while distracted by use of a handheld cell phone or other activities not related to driving.

Currently, 30 states and the District of Columbia have legislation in place banning text messaging for all drivers. Of the 30 states enforcing the ban, 23 states have a primary ban, four states have a secondary ban, and three states have legislation that have been signed but are not effective until the end of the year.

The difference between primary and secondary laws is noteworthy. Primary laws are stricter, stating drivers may be pulled over and cited if an officer sees them operating a cell phone while driving. In states with secondary laws, officers will pull over distracted drivers only if they are seen violating another primary law, such as speeding.

Approximately half of the states in the U.S. currently include a category for handheld or electronic equipment distraction on police accident report forms. However, recently proposed federal legislation would require all states to include this data to qualify for certain federal funding, according to the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA).

Most states allow local political subdivisions to enforce their own laws against distracted driving. However, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, and Oklahoma have preemption laws that prohibit political subdivisions in their states from doing so.

Despite the fact that California and Oregon have strict primary legislation enforced, NHTSA observed more drivers in Western states operating handheld electronic devices than in other regions of the country. In 2008, use of handheld devices also increased the most in the Western states, rising from 0.6 percent in 2007 to 2.1 percent in 2008.

Ad Loading...

Characterizing Different Distractions

NHTSA categorizes driving distractions into three categories: visual, manual, and cognitive. Visual distraction involves actions that require the driver to look away from the road to obtain information visually. The use of handheld devices falls under manual distraction, which requires the driver to take one hand off the steering wheel and operate a device. Cognitive distraction occurs when the driver focuses on something other than driving, shifting mental weight away from safety.

The duration and/or frequency of engaging in any distracted driving task is directly proportionate with the crash-risk level involved, according to NHTSA data. The crash risk increases to a level comparable to a difficult task performed less often as the duration and/or frequency of the task increases.  

A 2008 NHTSA report found distracted drivers were 50 percent more likely to have been seriously injured or killed in crashes compared to attentive drivers. The report also showed that about 70 percent of distracted-driver crashes involved non-collision or rear-end crashes, with the remainder being mostly angle collisions.

Distracted drivers were also more likely to crash during the evening or night-time hours and less likely on high-speed roadways, multi-lane roadways, curves, and intersections. Drivers usually spend about 10 percent of the time looking away from the road when driving normally, compared to 40 percent while sending text messages.

Studies funded by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety found the effect of hands-free cell phone use on driver attention is comparable to tuning a radio. In addition, the studies found hands-free devices do not have an effect on other distractions that may be present in or outside of the vehicle, which have proven to be equally as distracting as cell phone use. 

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

More Safety

Chris Brown sits across from safety experft at Lifesaver mobile in an interview about distracted driving and phone use tech.
Safetyby Chris BrownMay 1, 2026

Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel

Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 15, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2

As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 11, 2026

 Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash

What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Driver holding a phone while steering, illustrating distracted driving and the importance of mental awareness and attention on the road for fleet safety.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 10, 2026

From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers

Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.

Read More →
Safetyby StaffApril 8, 2026

Lytx 2026 Road Safety Report

While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.

Read More →
Driver’s hands on steering wheel in a sunlit vehicle, representing real-world driver behavior and the shift from data monitoring to hands-on training in fleet safety programs.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 7, 2026

Behind-the-Wheel vs. Classroom Training: What Actually Changes Driver Behavior?

Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
A person in a car on their phone behind the steering wheel.
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 1, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 1

A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.

Read More →
Pedestrians crossing a busy street, highlighting the importance of driver awareness and caution to prevent pedestrian accidents.
Safetyby StaffMarch 30, 2026

Pedestrian Safety Starts With the Driver

More people on foot means more risk for drivers. These pedestrian safety tips can help prevent serious injuries and keep everyone safer on the road.

Read More →
SponsoredMarch 30, 2026

Safety by Design: Power and Protection in the Freightliner 114SD Plus

Safer crews. Fewer incidents. Better uptime. Learn how driver-assist technology is changing the way vocational fleets operate.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safetyby StaffMarch 26, 2026

Pedestrian Deaths Drop in First Half of 2025, Marking Largest Decline in Years

An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.

Read More →