Clarifying NHTSA's Updated 5-Star Safety Rating Program
NHTSA’s updated safety rating program could result in lower ratings for 2011-MY vehicles, even though vehicles are no less safe than those of the previous model-year.

Click here for a PDF of the full article, including tables.
The updated five-star government safety rating program from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) includes enhanced crash tests and provides customers with an Overall Vehicle Score for the first time. According to NHTSA, this makes it easier to compare the relative safety performance of vehicles in crash survivability as well as crash avoidance. The new program is set to take effect for select 2011-MY vehicles.
Fifty-five 2011-MY passenger vehicles will be evaluated to receive the new safety ratings, according to NHTSA. The vehicles include 24 passenger cars, 20 sport/utility vehicles, two vans, and nine pickups. These ratings will be available on NHTSA's Safercar.gov Web site.
What Fleet Managers Should Know
More stringent criteria for rating vehicles means vehicles rated under the previous program cannot be compared to vehicles rated under the new rating program. It will be more difficult to receive a four- or five-star rating, and a vehicle given a five-star safety rating under the old system may, if reevaluated under the new system, receive less stars. It is important to note the same vehicle is no less safe just because it appears to receive less stars under the new rating system than the previous model-year.
Consequently, a 2011-MY vehicle that receives a five-star rating under the new program provides more overall protection than a vehicle receiving a five-star rating under the old program.
Fleet managers should be aware of potential confusion as a result of the change. Some manufacturers are working to communicate this information to consumers. Audi of America, for example, is keeping its field and dealership teams informed of the updated criteria. The luxury vehicle manufacturer breaks down the changes and lists and answers potential questions. The communication emphasizes that vehicles currently holding high ratings can be downgraded under the new rating system, which doesn't mean they are less safe. In addition, it states it is not possible to compare an old rating with the new rating.
Changes to Safety Ratings
Changes to the safety ratings are:
Front crash. NHTSA will maintain the 35-mph full frontal barrier test protocol, but will replace the mid-size male dummy in the right front passenger seat with a smaller female dummy.
Side impact. NHTSA will maintain the current moving deformable barrier test at 38.5 mph, but will update the test to include new side-impact test dummies and new injury criteria used to assign a vehicle's side impact barrier rating. There will be a side barrier rating and pole side-impact rating, and these will be combined for an overall side impact rating.
Rollover. The agency will continue to rate vehicles for rollover propensity, but will wait to update its rollover risk model to allow for more real-world crash data of vehicles equipped with electronic stability control (ESC).
The updated testing program will also provide consumers with new information about advanced crash avoidance technologies: ESC, forward collision warning (FCW) systems, and lane departure warning (LDW) systems. NHTSA will not rate the performance of these crash avoidance technologies, but will only note whether the vehicles come equipped with these technologies and whether they meet standards.
NHTSA will also establish a new Overall Vehicle Score, combining star ratings from the front, side, and rollover programs. The ratings are also compared to a baseline risk of injury, which tells consumers if the vehicle is above or below the average amount of injury risk.
NHTSA Ensures Clear Communications
NHTSA is working to ensure the dissemination of accurate and standardized information regarding the new five-star safety ratings, releasing a usage guideline for manufacturers and all consumer-based communications.
The guidelines define correct use of terms, as well as suggest phrases to be used for individual or combined safety ratings. The guidelines also discourage use of misleading terminology such as "perfect," "safest," "flawless," or "best-in-class" to describe the star ratings received by the vehicle.
For frontal- and side-crash safety ratings, the guidelines state that individual ratings (e.g., driver seating position and passenger seating position) should be kept separate and not added to form a new, higher star rating or a "double" star rating. Instead, NHTSA will provide an overall frontal-crash safety rating and overall side-crash safety rating, which also includes the baseline risk, for communications.
In addition, guidelines encourage disclosure of associated crash rating information if related information is noted. For example, if the side barrier star rating for the front seating position is publicized, results for the rear seating position should also be shown, and vice versa.
The guidelines further state that comparison of frontal crash ratings or overall vehicle scores should only occur if vehicles are in the same vehicle class and within 250 lbs. of each other. However, these comparisons can be made across weight categories as long as vehicles do not exceed the 250-lb. comparison limit.
More Safety

NAFA Fleet Safety Symposium to Collocate With 2026 Fleet Forward Conference
The daylong certificate program will precede the Fleet Forward Conference at the Gaylord National Harbor in Maryland.
Read More →
The Distractions You Can’t Turn Off: What Drivers Face Outside the Vehicle
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
FLASH Weather AI Launches First Deep-Learning Hail Prediction Model With High-Resolution Forecasting
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
How Coca-Cola United Protects Its Fleet from Growing Legal Risk
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
How to Speak the Same Language on Fleet Safety
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
Fleet Cybersecurity 101: What You Need from Your Technology Vendors
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →