MENU
SEARCHLane departure prevention systems that wait too long to initiate steering input or fail to prevent lane drifts greater than 35 centimeters may cause drivers to deactivate them, according to a new study from the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety.
Drivers often deactivate lane departure systems that are too slow to intervene.
Photo courtesy of IIHS.
Lane departure prevention systems that wait too long to initiate steering input or fail to prevent lane drifts greater than 35 centimeters may cause drivers to deactivate them, according to a new study from the Insurance Institute of Highway Safety.
The study results indicate that early intervention via slight nudges from the steering wheel and subtle braking as soon as tires start to drift could be key to increasing use of this crash avoidance technology.
IIHS evaluated lane departure prevention systems from Ford, General Motors, Honda, and Volvo to assess where steering or braking occurred relative to lane markings, and whether the efforts successfully kept the vehicles in their travel lanes.
Tests were conducted at 50 mph with cruise control engaged on a four-lane highway. Test vehicles included three 2016 models, specifically, Chevrolet Malibu with Lane Keep Assist, Ford Fusion with Lane Keeping System, and Honda Accord with Road Departure Mitigation. A 2018 Volvo S90 with Lane Keeping also underwent testing.
Test drivers induced 40 lane drifts on left and right curves by steering their respective vehicles straight into the curve so that vehicles departed in the opposite direction and 40 lane drifts on straightaways by slight steering input to direct the vehicle to the left and right lane markers.
Early intervention via slight nudges from the steering wheel and subtle braking as soon as tires start to drift could be key to increasing use of this crash avoidance technology.
Photo courtesy of IIHS.
With the use of outboard cameras and video, researchers determined whether a vehicle crossed lane markers by more than 35 centimeters (about 14 inches) on any of its trials.
Both the Malibu and S90 systems provided steering input further inside the lane than the Accord and Fusion, and they produced the lowest mean peak changes in the yaw rate. On both curves and straightaways, the Malibu and S90 avoided a much larger proportion of lane marker crossings exceeding 35 centimeters than the Accord and Fusion.
The S90 avoided crossing the inside edge of solid lane markers by more than 35 centimeters on 100 percent of the trials, and the Malibu avoided doing so on 80% of the trials. In contrast, the Accord and Fusion avoided crossing lane markers by more than 35 centimeters in less than 20% of the trials.
IIHS concludes that intervention that comes sooner rather than later may allow for more subtle input that keeps the vehicle in its lane. In addition, it may prompt drivers to consistently use the lane departure prevention system.
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →
While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.
Read More →
