Related: Will We Become too Reliant on Driver-Assisting Tech?
Drivers Overestimating Safety Tech Capabilities: AAA
Four out of 10 Americans overestimate the capabilities of semi-automated driving systems based on their names, which indicates a lack of understanding of the technologies and a possible safety risk, according to a new survey from AAA.

Four out of 10 Americans overestimate the capabilities of semi-automated driving systems based on their names.
Graphic courtesy of AAA.
Four out of 10 Americans overestimate the capabilities of semi-automated driving systems based on their names, which indicates a lack of understanding of the technologies and a possible safety risk, according to a new survey from AAA.
Specifically, the survey found that names like Autopilot, ProPilot or Pilot Assist led many people to believe the system was entirely autonomous and had the ability to drive the car by itself.
Millennials were the top group to be misled by the system names, with 59% believing the system could drive the vehicle. Generation Xers ranked second, with 40% sharing that view. However, only 27% of Baby Boomers were fooled by the system names.
To assess the actual capabilities of partially automated vehicle systems, AAA also tested the systems to see how they performed in common driving circumstances. Testing was done on both a closed course and on public highways using four test vehicles equipped with the technologies.
The findings indicate that today's partially automated driving systems are not designed to take over the task of driving and can be significantly challenged by common, real-world conditions like poor lane markings, unusual traffic patterns and stationary vehicles.
One key finding included that 88% of events that called for driver intervention in a real-world setting were due to the vehicle's inability to maintain lane position.
The challenging lane-keeping events occurred most often on freeways with moderate traffic and by urban driving along surface streets. Systems generally performed best on open freeways and freeways with stop and go traffic.
Closed-course testing revealed another key finding that three of four test vehicles required driver intervention to avoid colliding with a simulated stationary object.
More Safety

NAFA Fleet Safety Symposium to Collocate With 2026 Fleet Forward Conference
The daylong certificate program will precede the Fleet Forward Conference at the Gaylord National Harbor in Maryland.
Read More →
The Distractions You Can’t Turn Off: What Drivers Face Outside the Vehicle
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
FLASH Weather AI Launches First Deep-Learning Hail Prediction Model With High-Resolution Forecasting
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
How Coca-Cola United Protects Its Fleet from Growing Legal Risk
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
How to Speak the Same Language on Fleet Safety
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
Fleet Cybersecurity 101: What You Need from Your Technology Vendors
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →