MENU
SEARCHA study at the University of Toronto concludes that driver warnings projected on the windshield run the risk of compromising the driver’s attention to the road.
Image courtesy of University of Toronto Department of Psychology.
Image courtesy of University of Toronto Department of Psychology.
A study from the University of Toronto is raising questions about vehicle safety systems that project digital driver alerts on vehicle windshields.
Such augmented-reality, head-up displays (AR-HUDs) are designed to help keep the driver’s eyes focused on the road ahead. The warning message is in the driver’s normal field of vision. Such alerts warn drivers about everything from possible crashes to smartphone activity.
But researchers concluded that these kinds of alerts can potentially divide the driver’s visual and cognitive attention and distract from the primary task of driving. This risk, the study found, is especially pronounced in difficult driving conditions and can lead to what’s known as “inattentional blindness.”
“Our data suggest that the AR-HUD warning may have an unexpected and unintended consequence – the driver’s attention to the road and traffic is likely to be compromised due to the competition between the normal perceptual processing associated with attending to the road and the need to allocate attentional and other cognitive resources to dealing with the AR-HUD warnings,” the study concludes. “Furthermore, this rivalry for the driver’s attention is most likely to occur when the driving environment is demanding.”
The study was published in the June issue of Plos One. The research project was funded by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.
Psychology Professor Ian Spence and students Yuechuan Sun and Sijing Wu designed two tests to measure the impact of AR-HUD warnings on driver attention.
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →
While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.
Read More →
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
Read More →
