Automotive Fleet
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Red-Light Cameras Help Prevent Fatal Crashes

A new study from IIHS finds that implementing a red-light camera program results in 21% fewer fatal red-light-running crashes per capita.

by Staff
July 30, 2016
Red-Light Cameras Help Prevent Fatal Crashes

Photo courtesy of IIHS.

3 min to read


Photo courtesy of IIHS.

Red-light camera programs continue to generate public controversy, but a new study from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety concludes that such programs in 79 large U.S. cities saved nearly 1,300 lives through 2014.

IIHS researchers contend that eliminating red-light camera programs costs lives, with the rate of fatal red-light-running crashes rising 30% in cities that have scrapped the programs.

Ad Loading...

Red-light-running crashes resulted in 709 deaths in 2014 and an estimated 126,000 injuries, according to IIHS. Drivers who ran a red light represent a minority of the people who died in these crashes. Most of those killed were occupants of other vehicles, passengers in vehicles running red lights, pedestrians, or bicyclists.

“Red light cameras are valuable enforcement tools that prevent many dangerous intersection crashes,” said IIHS President Adrian Lund. “This study confirms that cameras reduce fatal crashes and for the first time quantifies the effect that ending these programs has on safety.”

IIHS researchers looked at the 57 cities of 200,000 or more people that activated cameras between 1992 and 2014 and didn’t shut them off. They compared the trends in annual per-capita fatal crash rates in those cities with the trends in 33 cities that never had cameras.

After accounting for the effects of population density and unemployment rates, the researchers found there were 21% fewer fatal red-light-running crashes per capita in cities with cameras than would have occurred without cameras and 14% fewer fatal crashes of all types at signalized intersections.

As expected, IIHS noted, the cameras have their biggest effect on red-light-running crashes. However, the analysis shows they reduce other types of fatal intersection crashes as well. Drivers may be more cautious in general when they know there are cameras capturing images of their driving. In addition, red-light-running fatalities may be undercounted.

Ad Loading...

When applied to all 57 cities, as well as 22 cities that started and ended camera programs, the lower intersection crash rate translates into 1,296 lives saved during the years the cameras were operational, according to the study.

The second part of the study focused on 14 cities that terminated their camera programs between 2010 and 2014. The researchers compared trends in annual crash rates in those cities with trends in crash rates in 29 cities in the same regions that continued their camera programs. The fatal red-light-running crash rate was 30% higher in cities that turned off cameras than it would have been if the cameras remained on. The rate of fatal crashes at signalized intersections was 16% higher, the study found.

The 16% increase translates into an estimated 63 deaths that would have been prevented in the 14 cities if they had not turned off their cameras, IIHS said.

“Debates over automated enforcement often center on the hassle of getting a ticket and paying a fine,” Lund said. “It's important to remember that there are hundreds of people walking around who wouldn’t be here if not for red light cameras. Sadly, there are 63 families who are missing a loved one because these life-saving programs were canceled.”

Nonetheless, a level of public distrust of red-light camera programs persists, with some critics arguing that their primary purpose is to raise city revenue. A scandal in Chicago has helped fuel such skepticism.

Ad Loading...

To download the full IIHS study, click here.

To view a list of state laws regarding red-light cameras, click here.

More Safety

A person with hands on the steering wheel driving
Safetyby Judie NuskeyMay 15, 2026

The Distractions You Can’t Turn Off: What Drivers Face Outside the Vehicle

Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.

Read More →
Hail covers the windshield and hood of a black vehicle with text overlay about FLASH Weather AI’s new hail prediction model.
Safetyby News/Media ReleaseMay 13, 2026

FLASH Weather AI Launches First Deep-Learning Hail Prediction Model With High-Resolution Forecasting

FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.

Read More →
Coca-Cola fleet executive smiling beside graphic text reading “Rolling Dollar Signs” about the company’s trucking and fleet strategy.
Safetyby Chris BrownMay 12, 2026

How Coca-Cola United Protects Its Fleet from Growing Legal Risk

As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Two trucking industry workers talk in front of semi-trucks beside text reading, “The issue isn’t lack of safety technology — it’s lack of alignment.”
SafetyMay 12, 2026

How to Speak the Same Language on Fleet Safety

Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.

Read More →
pictures of a lock with the words Cybersecurity 101
Safetyby Jeanny RoaMay 11, 2026

Fleet Cybersecurity 101: What You Need from Your Technology Vendors

From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.

Read More →
Chris Brown sits across from safety experft at Lifesaver mobile in an interview about distracted driving and phone use tech.
Safetyby Chris BrownMay 1, 2026

Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel

Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 15, 2026

Distracted Driving in the Age of Smart Tech – Part 2

As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.

Read More →
Safetyby Jeanny RoaApril 11, 2026

 Data Rights, Risks, and Responsibilities After a Crash

What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.

Read More →
Driver holding a phone while steering, illustrating distracted driving and the importance of mental awareness and attention on the road for fleet safety.
Safetyby Judie NuskeyApril 10, 2026

From Distraction to Detection: Strengthening Awareness in Fleet Drivers

Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Safetyby StaffApril 8, 2026

Lytx 2026 Road Safety Report

While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.

Read More →