Legal Hurdles of Self-Driving Cars Studied by NHTSA
A NHTSA report identifies instances where current federal safety standards might hinder future development and deployment of autonomous vehicles.
by Staff
March 14, 2016
Photo of BMW i3 self-driving car courtesy of BMW.
3 min to read
Photo of BMW i3 self-driving car courtesy of BMW.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has released a study aimed at identifying potential legal barriers that today’s federal vehicle safety standards might pose to the introduction of self-driving cars.
The report, prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, identifies key challenges to full deployment of autonomous vehicles as well as current safety standards requiring further review. The study stresses the need to develop standards that help ensure safe vehicle operation but don’t create hurdles that could stifle future innovation.
Ad Loading...
“Many standards, as currently written, are based on assumptions of conventional vehicle designs and thus pose challenges for certain design concepts, particularly for 'driverless' concepts where human occupants have no way of driving the vehicle,” the report noted. Examples include safety standards addressing steering wheels and brake pedals.
NHTSA will also hold a pair of public meetings this spring to gather input as the agency develops safety guidelines for autonomous vehicle technology. The first meeting will be held April 8 in Washington, D.C. The second meeting is set for California.
Federal regulators are well aware that self-driving vehicle developers are in need of operational guidance. The report notes that in the past NHTSA has released safety guideline interpretations to BMW of North America and Google in response to questions about specific requirements in the context of automated vehicles.
“We are witnessing a revolution in auto technology that has the potential to save thousands of lives,” said Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx. “In order to achieve that potential, we need to establish guidelines for manufacturers that clearly outline how we expect automated vehicles to function — not only safely, but more safely — on our roads.”
These operational guidelines represent one of five NHTSA initiatives Foxx announced in January at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. The other four are:
Ad Loading...
President Obama’s budget proposal for a 10-year, $3.9 billion investment in advancing autonomous vehicle technology, including large deployment pilots in communities around the country.
Working with states to develop model state policy.
Using NHTSA’s existing authority to interpret current regulations, and offer limited exemptions from those regulations, in pursuit of advances that could increase safety.
Determining what new regulatory tools and authorities might be required to meet NHTSA’s safety mission in an era of rapidly changing technology.
“The Volpe Center report is a great first look at the current standards, and it highlights the need for the actions Secretary Foxx outlined in January,” said NHTSA Administrator Mark Rosekind. “It also shows there are few current restrictions on some automated vehicle concepts, which highlights the need to establish clear expectations for their safe operation. At the same time, for other vehicle designs, the agency has more work to do to ensure the safety of new innovations, and we look forward to learning more from stakeholders as we start that work.”
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
