The criminal case settlement with federal prosecutors requires payment of $900 million and the hiring of an independent monitor to oversee the company’s safety practices.
by Staff
September 17, 2015
The defective ignition switches were installed in several GM models, including the Pontiac G5. Photo courtesy of GM.
2 min to read
The defective ignition switches were installed in several GM models, including the Pontiac G5. Photo courtesy of GM.
In a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice, General Motors has agreed to pay $900 million and admit to misleading federal regulators and the public about defective ignition switches installed in millions of vehicles, according to a report from Reuters.
GM has also agreed to hire an independent monitor to oversee the company’s safety practices and reporting procedures, as part of a three-year deferred federal prosecution agreement, the news agency reported.
Ad Loading...
The independent monitor will also operate a phone line to allow employees and others to report safety violations anonymously.
If the settlement receives court approval and GM complies with all terms, federal prosecutors will drop related criminal charges. Settlement documents were filed in federal court, and an arraignment hearing is set for Sept. 17.
The ignition switches have been tied to 124 deaths.
“The mistakes that led to the ignition switch recall should never have happened. We have apologized and we do so again today,” said GM CEO Mary Barra in a released statement. “We have faced our issues with a clear determination to do the right thing both for the short term and the long term. I believe that our response has been unprecedented in terms of candor, cooperation, transparency and compassion.”
Additionally, the automaker announced it has settled certain civil cases also associated with 2014 recalls, including those involving defective ignition switches. Because of the settlements, GM said it will record a charge of $575 million in the third quarter.
Ad Loading...
One settlement resolves a shareholder class-action suit seeking damages for approximately 1,380 individual death and personal injury claimants, GM said.
“The parties to these agreements have resolved difficult claims without the burden, expense and uncertainty of litigation,” said Craig Glidden, GM executive vice president and general counsel, about settling the civil actions.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
