Federal Investigators Blame Bridge Collapse on Gusset Plate Design Flaw
MINNEAPOLIS --- Federal safety investigators have concluded that the original designers of the Interstate 35W bridge apparently neglected to calculate the required size of key gusset plates, a mistake that 40 years later resulted in the death of 13 people after the span collapsed, the Star Tribune reported.
MINNEAPOLIS --- Federal safety investigators have concluded that the original designers of the Interstate 35W bridge apparently neglected to calculate the required size of key gusset plates, a mistake that 40 years later resulted in the death of 13 people after the span collapsed, the Star Tribune reported.
Investigators also have found that corrosion of certain gusset plates, extreme heat and shifting piers did not contribute to the bridge's collapse on Aug. 1, 2007, sources told the newspaper.
Investigators will present their findings to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which will publicly review the draft report in a hearing Nov. 13 in Washington. After that, the board will use the draft as the basis for its final report on the probable cause of the bridge collapse and recommendations for preventing future disasters.
If key steel gusset plates had been designed properly -- they were one-half inch thick instead of an inch -- the bridge would have been able to withstand tons of concrete and steel added in two renovation projects as well as the 287-ton construction load on the bridge the day it collapsed, sources told the Star Tribune.
In January, NTSB Chairman Mark Rosenker was criticized by U.S. Rep. Jim Oberstar (D-MN.) and others for placing too much early emphasis on gusset plate failure as the potential cause. But the investigators' findings appear to validate Rosenker's early statements.
Investigators found records showing that the bridge designers knew how to calculate the thickness of gusset plates, but probably did not perform that task for the bridge's center portion, where the initial failure occurred, the Star Tribune reported. Investigators leave open the possibility that the design firm, Sverdrup & Parcel, carried out the calculations but erred. That assessment is based on a review of the original work papers of the St. Louis-based firm. The firm was later acquired by Jacobs Engineering of San Francisco.
More Safety

AAA Testing Finds Gaps in Intersection AEB Crash Prevention
Testing of four 2026 model-year vehicles found that automatic emergency braking prevented collisions in standardized intersection scenarios, but three vehicles failed to avoid crashes when another vehicle turned into their path.
Read More →
Which Fleet Types Have the Highest Severe Speeding Rates?
New research from SambaSafety finds significant differences in speeding rates across fleet industries, even as nearly 90% of surveyed fleets report using telematics.
Read More →
When a Cyberattack Hits Your Fleet: What Happens Next?
“You have two opportunities to test your plans: when you choose or when the threat actor chooses.” A cybersecurity expert reveals what fleet managers need to know before a cyberattack puts their operations at risk — and why the decisions made in the first moments can shape the entire recovery.
Read More →
Tips for Driving Safely on Halloween Night
This video features a reminder from the Connecticut Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Connecticut Police Chiefs Association, urging drivers to prioritize safety this Halloween.
Read More →
IIHS Crash Avoidance Tests Reveal Safety Gaps in Cargo Vans and Work Trucks
New IIHS crash avoidance ratings show uneven performance among cargo vans and heavy-duty pickups, with most struggling to avoid vehicle-to-vehicle collisions.
Read More →
What’s Next for Fleet? Safety, AI & Industry Recognition | AF News Recap
Could your company's culture be encouraging distracted driving? This week, we're exploring how workplace expectations affect driver safety, what AI, EVs, and autonomous vehicles could mean for the future of fleet management, and how fleet professionals can strengthen their award nominations.
Read More →
Does Your Fleet's Culture Encourage Distracted Driving?
What happens when the people responsible for enforcing safety rules are the ones setting the wrong example? The answer may reveal why some of the biggest risks to fleet drivers have little to do with what's written in the employee handbook.
Read More →
Fleet Manager’s Ultimate Playbook: Navigating the New Standard in OEM Connectivity
Rising operating costs, driver safety concerns, and unplanned downtime are putting unprecedented pressure on modern fleets. Discover how fleet managers use embedded OEM connectivity and real-time vehicle data to cut TCO, prevent downtime, and protect drivers without aftermarket telematics hardware.
Read More →
From Driver Well-Being to EV Charging | AF News Recap
Mental health belongs in the fleet safety conversation. This week, we’re looking at five ways fleets can support employee well-being before a crisis, plus Holman’s expansion in Mexico, new one-day Fleet Forward passes, and why EV charging demand is outpacing infrastructure growth.
Read More →
Nexar-Nauto Merger Aims to Give Fleets Better Safety Intelligence Through Larger Driving Dataset
Stefan Heck tells Automotive Fleet that combining more than 10 billion miles of driving history with Nexar's AI models will give fleets deeper insights into driver risk and roadway conditions than either company could provide independently.
Read More →