Spec Writing and Getting what You Need Legitimately
Some fleet managers play the “bogus spec game” to buy what they or their customers want within the framework of bidding policies designed to ensure open and honest competition. There is a better way to get what you need.
For many fleets, the vehicle selection process ends with developing a set of specifications to accompany a request for bids and then selecting from the bids received. Determining what is needed is the critical first step, requiring technical expertise, market research, and close communication with customers and vendors. Actually acquiring the best vehicle or equipment, if it doesn’t happen to have the lowest net acquisition cost, is a bit trickier and requires establishing purchasing policy groundwork before bids. Far too many fleet managers play the “bogus spec game” as the easy way out to buy what they or their customers want within the framework of bidding policies designed to ensure open and honest competition. You know who you are - spec’ing a drivetrain combination or radiator size only available in one make/model truck; worse still, requiring an option standard on the model you want but only available in a pricey trim group for others. These are thinly disguised techniques that don’t escape vendors’ notice even if purchasing agents are willing to “wink and nod” as the sham is played out. What happens when you get called on this practice or you get a new purchasing agent who won’t be your dupe or accomplice? There is a better way to get what you need.
Vehicle Specifications
Performance, design, and proprietary are the three basic types of vehicle specifications. Bid specs may be primarily of one type or encompass elements of each. The National Association of Fleet Administrators (NAFA) defines these spec types as:
• Performance Specifications: A description of a vehicle’s operating requirements, such as gross weight, speed, acceleration, maximum grade negotiability, weight and volume-carrying capacity, fuel economy, emissions levels, axle loads and distribution, and compliance with industrial or governmental standards and/or statutes such as SAE, OSHA, or DOT.
• Design Specifications: A description of a vehicle’s physical dimensions, structural properties (e.g., moments of inertia, resistance to bending, tensile or yield strengths) or other engineering parameters (e.g., power or torque).
• Proprietary Specifications: A description of a vehicle’s required equipment specific to a particular manufacturer, such as a Cat engine, Allison transmission, or Eaton rear axle.
Performance and design specification types generally suffice to acquire the desired vehicle. Be careful not to make specs more restrictive than necessary to avoid narrowing choices unintentionally. Rejecting bids that don’t meet legitimate requirements is generally not a problem. However, trying to use proprietary specs and disguising them as performance or design requirements is eventually what gets most fleet managers in trouble. True, once you find something that works, it is easier to simply require that product year after year. The problem with this strategy is that it discounts the impact of innovation and competition.
On the other hand, proprietary specs are obviously essential if your goal is standardizing on a product line to simplify and reduce maintenance costs, including technician training, parts inventory, specialty tools, and diagnostic equipment. This can be an effective cost-control strategy as long as bidding the standardized product line remains competitive. If you want to standardize on a vehicle product line but doubt the ability or willingness of purchasing agents to comply, take a look at how they buy other equipment, such as computers or software. The justification to standardize on “Brand X” truck is much more compelling financially than it is for buying “Brand B” computer or software suite - of course, it is up to you to crunch the numbers and present a compelling argument.
While you’re reshaping your organization’s vehicle purchasing policy, don’t forget to include provisions for lifecycle cost elements, including historical depreciation/resale performance, operating costs, insurance rates/risk, local parts availability, and anything else that can be quantified to ensure the best choice wins. Make vendors compete on more than purchase price when you can do it for legitimate reasons. The litmus test for valid reasons in making purchasing decisions is that they can be justified with your integrity and reputation intact. Baseless product prejudices can’t be justified, and you shouldn’t even try.
FOR MORE INFORMATION: Chris Amos, CAFM, is commissioner of Equipment Services for the City of St. Louis, Mo., and senior associate, Mercury Associates, Inc. He can be reached at: camos@mercury-assoc.com.
More Operations

Moventum Fleet Management Names Mark Iorillo Head of Sales
Iorillo brings nearly 20 years of fleet management and sales experience to the role, including previous positions at Element Fleet Management, CEI, Donlen and Ryder.
Read More →
Fleet Has a Talent Pipeline Problem. What Comes Next? | AF News Recap
Where will fleet’s next generation of leaders come from? This week, we’re looking at the industry’s talent pipeline, what certification can add to a fleet career, how to build an award-worthy track record, and the return of Automotive Fleet’s Personal Use Survey.
Read More →
Smith System Launches Driver Risk Management Program
Fleets have more driver data than ever, but identifying risky behavior doesn't necessarily correct it. Smith System's new Driver Risk Management program combines monitoring, training, and follow-up coaching to help fleets connect risk signals with driver intervention.
Read More →
Automotive Fleet Opens 2026 Personal Use Survey for Commercial Fleet Managers
Less than two weeks left! Commercial and corporate fleet managers are invited to share how their organizations handle company vehicle personal-use policies, charges, and driver eligibility.
Read More →
From AI Prompts to AI-Generated Safety Songs | AF News Recap
Can better prompts make AI more useful for fleet managers? This week, we’re breaking down smarter fleet analysis, an AI-assisted experiment that turned safety training into music, and what happened to fuel prices in August.
Read More →
How to Write Better AI Prompts for Fleet Analysis
Include these six elements in your fleet prompts to generate more relevant analysis and accurate answers.
Read More →
Fleet Meets: Eric Kilgore
This edition of the Fleet Meets series features one of the industry's best leaders driving multi-market and national operations.
Read More →
Why Reactive Fleet Management Is Becoming Too Expensive to Sustain
Research highlights a growing need for proactive management strategies to address rising costs in fleet operations effectively.
Read More →
What Your Fleet KPIs Aren’t Telling You
Tracking fleet metrics is only useful when the data leads to better decisions. This guide helps fleet leaders assess cost, utilization, and downtime more accurately, identify performance gaps, and prioritize the actions that can improve operational results.
Read More →
Hidden in Plain Sight: Fleet Compliance Risks
Fleet compliance isn't just about having policies — it's about consistently enforcing them. This practical guide reveals six hidden compliance risks common in public sector and shared fleet operations and outlines proven strategies to improve visibility, accountability, and audit readiness
Read More →