GM's Electric Van
What has four wheels, runs on pennies a day, needs no gasoline, and is virtually maintenance-free? The answer: an electric van. Fleet professionals at United Airlines have been quick to recognize its potential.
Out on the tarmac of the San Francisco International Air-port, a van bearing United Airlines colors makes its rounds. The van is readily identified as a General Motors product, even at night, when it's usually employed. The vehicle is used by the swing and graveyard shifts of the airline's aircraft engineering group to deliver tools and equipment to technicians servicing United jetliners. The van moves from one area to another, rarely traveling more than three miles in a spurt. When it's not being driven, it sits idling with its lights on and its electrical systems operating. In cold or wet weather, the wipers and heaters are left running as well.
Among the multitude of vans in United's vehicle fleet at maintenance bases both in San Francisco and at Chicago's O'Hare Airport, this van is unique. It is absolutely silent when it's being driven. It produces no pollution. It is electric.
Bob Matkovich, a staff engineer with United's fleet management operations in its ground equipment and maintenance group, rates the electric van's operations highly. "We've had the vehicle in service more than two years, and we've had no problems, no major repairs, and little downtime. The van is typical of more than 100 electric vehicles we use, such as baggage tractors, belt loaders, and container loaders," Matkovich says. "Electric vehicles give us the reliability we need, and this van is so reliable we don't even have a maintenance history on it."
Echoing Matkovich's praise of the electric van is Dick Thayer, foreman of plant and ground equipment maintenance. "I think electric vehicles definitely have a place here," he says. "They're quiet, pollution-free, and maintenance-free. In the time we've had the electric van, we've had few problems. Once the battery tray had to be removed to be straightened after a minor accident when the van was driven over an aircraft part and the tray frame was bent. And the lever operating the windshield wipers has been torn off several times by people who thought it was a gear shift."
Doug McMahon, lead mechanic at United's San Francisco maintenance base, reports, "It's a very good vehicle. We've had no maintenance problems whatsoever, and the people who drive it like it." Maintenance, according to McMahon, consists of recharging the batteries and replenishing the battery water supply. Water replenishment, done on the average of once a month, requires hooking up to an automatic watering trolley. "We just attach quick-disconnect couplings to receptacles under the hood and leave it alone," McMahon explains. "When the water level is correct, the equipment shuts off. It takes a few minutes at most." To recharge the batteries takes from eight to 14 hours, according to McMahon. Recharging is typically done during daylight hours when the vehicle is out of service. Lines from a dolly-type charger, specifically designed to service the vehicle, are plugged in under the hood, and the batteries are automatically recharged.
The United Airlines GM van is one of 36 originally shipped to North America for testing and evaluation. All of these units were manufactured in the United Kingdom by Bedford Commercial Vehicles, a division of General Motors Overseas Commercial Vehicle Corp., in cooperation with Lucas Chloride EV Systems Ltd. The vans, based on GM's G-van but slightly smaller, are called Griffons. Coordination of the electric van program in the U.S.is handled through the Electric Vehicle Development Corp. (EVDC), since the production of vehicles was stopped in England.
The program began with a shipment of four vehicles to the U.S. in 1984, according to Dave Harris, operations manager-North America for Lucas Chloride. In 1986, further deployment resulted in the increase to 36 Griffon electric vans, 31 shipped to the U.S. and five to Canada. The van began its life as a chassis, or glider, with no engine or transmission. The van is upfitted with electric components consisting of a drive motor, battery pack, and controller, which form the drive system.
Since 1977, more than 100 prototype electric vans have traveled more than 1.5 million operational miles throughout the world. During 1986 the North American GM Griffons accumulated more than 200,000 miles of use. The vans have proven to be traffic compatible, which means they can maintain normal street and highway speeds, and are cost efficient. The Griffin's top speed is 50 to 60 mph, with acceleration from 0 to 30 mph in 11 to 13 seconds. The van's range is 50 to 60 miles before recommended recharging. The electric van's operating costs are competitive with those of a gasoline-powered van. In United Airlines fleet service, the GM electric van cost under $2.00 per hour. Calculating the performance comparison, Bedford/GM began with annual mileage of 11,250, or 45 miles per day, five days per week, as the working range of the vehicle. The data assumed an eight-year in-service life for the vehicle. The higher depreciation costs were offset by the lower maintenance costs, and the cost of the battery over its four-year life were offset by substantially reduced fuel costs. However, when the electric van is compared to the gas-powered van over a six-year life cycle, the electric van came out ahead in cost savings.
Because of interest and enthusiasm from van-fleet operators and increased pressure from environmental agencies across the U.S. for the deployment of vehicles using alternate fuels, the electric van is rapidly gaining acceptance. It is projected that the potential for the electric vehicle market for various truck models, including vans, will approximate 300,000 units by 1992.
That projection results from data collected by the EVDC, which is a nonprofit group funded by membership dues from utilities, vehicle manufacturers, and various other institutions. EVDC was formed as an extension of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) to promote the commercial and market development for electric vehicles.
According to Brunner, national results of a recently-conducted survey in the 30 leading urban markets, representing 50 percent of all the commercial fleets in the U.S., indicate that current-technology vehicles, such as the GM electric van, could potentially replace 137,000 vans in commercial fleets in those top 30 markets alone.
According to Jack Davis, fleet account executive for Chevrolet Motor Division, Chevrolet plans to market an electric G-van model (CG11305) with a 6,600 GVWR beginning in September or October this year. The vehicle will be a 1989-model-year van featuring a cruising range of 50 to 60 miles and carrying a one-and-a-half-ton payload. The electric van will be produced at GM's Lordstown, OH plant and shipped as a glider for the aftermarket installation of a Chloride electric power unit.
"A market will really develop among large fleets in metropolitan areas, where we anticipate additional incentives for air quality," he predicts. "For example, New York City is mandating the percentages of electric vehicles in fleets and considering free parking for electric vehicles, which could be a considerable savings in fleet budgets."
More Operations

How to Manage Conflict for Your Fleet Operations
Conflict management is becoming a core leadership skill. Here are five strategies fleet leaders should know.
Read More →
Turning Connected Vehicle Data Into Decisions That Matter
Fleet leaders have more data than ever, but turning that data into clear, actionable decisions remains a challenge. This white paper shows how leading organizations are using connected vehicle data to improve safety, reduce costs, and optimize fleet performance. Learn how to turn insight into action across your fleet.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-time Prevention
Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Learn more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab.
Read More →Are You Tracking Your Fleet's True Total Cost of Ownership?
Bobit Business Media surveyed 190 fleet professionals and found that while most fleets are tracking costs, fragmented systems and data gaps are keeping true TCO visibility out of reach. With rising pressure to control spend in an increasingly volatile environment, the gap between what fleets think they know and what the data actually shows is wider than you might expect. See how your peers are managing costs today and where the industry still has room to improve.
Read More →
Turn Fleet Data Into Smarter Decisions
Fleet leaders have access to more operational data than ever, but disconnected systems and unclear metrics often slow decision-making instead of improving it. This article outlines five practical steps fleets can take to transform fragmented data into actionable insights that improve planning, safety, utilization, and long-term performance.
Read More →
Hybrids: Electrification Without the Challenges
For fleet managers, fuel is one of the biggest line items in the budget — and it's one hybrids can shrink without changing how your people work. Download the eBook to see the numbers, understand the technology, and get a step-by-step guide to making the switch.
Read More →
How NOV Uses Telematics to Improve Fleet Safety Across 160 Locations
James Victory of NOV discusses how the company manages fleet safety, maintenance, and telematics across more than 150 locations supporting oilfield operations throughout the U.S.
Read More →
Fleet Meets: Steven Santostasi
This edition of the Fleet Meets series features Steven Santostasi, the current TSP channel manager for Ford Pro.
Read More →
Why Fleet Managers Are Replacing Departmental Vehicles with Shared Motor Pools
Departmentally assigned vehicles often create hidden costs through underutilization, poor visibility, and increased administrative burden. This white paper explores how shared motor pool strategies help fleets reduce costs, improve accountability, and optimize vehicle utilization.
Read More →Soap Box Derby Challenge: Assembling the Crew
Meet Gabriel, Matthew, and Angel — the team helping bring this soap box derby build to life.
Read More →
