Battery Capacity an Overlooked Factor in Autonomous Vehicle Deployment, Performance
Autonomous services using electric vehicles will need to consider battery limitations to optimize service deployment, fleet performance, and fleet orchestration.

Beep Inc. provides autonomous shuttle services in planned communities and low-speed environments. Beep has partnered with Bestmile to manage its autonomous shuttle fleets. Beep and other autonomous service providers must consider issues such as vehicle weight, travel speed, terrain grade, and temperature ranges to ascertain battery capacity and range.
Photo courtesy of Bestmile.
Amazon recently announced the order of 100,000 electric vans to be delivered by 2030. For perspective, that’s more vehicles than FedEx currently uses worldwide. Of the many points of discussion around autonomous electric vehicles and the services they are expected to deliver, one underrepresented topic is the battery capacity of electric vehicles and the limitations this imposes.
Most autonomous vehicles, in the long term, are expected to be electric for several reasons. Electric drivetrains require less maintenance than their gas counterparts. The fuel is less expensive than gasoline. They are easier to refuel without human intervention. Electric vehicle batteries are subject to variations of range and power that introduce new variables for fleet orchestration.
More than Just Range
Vehicle range is usually the first topic that comes to mind when it comes to electric vehicles — how far can the vehicle travel. But that is a tricky issue because the range is impacted by a number of factors unrelated to sheer distance.
As with a gas-powered vehicle, electric vehicles use more power as their speed increases. Autonomous vehicles use energy as they process data, and the computers driving the cars process some 11 terabytes of data per day by some estimates.
Battery capacity is also influenced by temperatures — lithium, the type of battery most electric vehicles use, doesn’t like cold, and some AV shuttle services have been forced to shut down during cold weather. Air conditioning is another power drain, to the chagrin of an agency in Rhode Island that found its shuttles were not equipped with air conditioning and had to keep them garaged during summer heatwaves.
Vehicle weight (number of passengers, presence of bicycles or wheelchairs, etc.) is another factor in energy use. And there are limits to the steepness of the grades that some vehicles can climb due to power constraints.
No Two Rides Are Alike
As a result, no two rides consume the same amount of battery power.
Vehicle energy availability becomes an even bigger issue when it comes to managing on-demand mobility services using electric vehicles. Whether moving packages or people, if there are constraints like guaranteed delivery times, ride times, and wait times, a vehicle’s battery strength is one of the many variables that need to be considered when deciding what vehicle to send to what traveler at what time.
Does the vehicle have the juice to complete a mission? Does it have enough battery power to reach a charging station after the mission? Where is the nearest charging station? Are there any hills or other energy intensive features of the route? How many vehicles are already waiting to be charged? How long can a vehicle afford to wait before it runs out of power?
Those are the issues on the front side of autonomous vehicle refueling. On the backside are questions like, when will a vehicle that is being charged return to service? Where should it be positioned in the event that there are no current ride requests near the charging station?
Service Design Issues
The location and capacity of charging stations are important considerations in service design. The number of vehicles, their passenger/package space, and service area dimensions and geography will be limited by the proximity and capacity of charging depots. Because each mission will consume different amounts of energy on every trip, this data has to be monitored and factored into every dispatch in real-time.
Energy use and availability are just two of the factors that make fleet orchestration so complex. For passenger services, the locations of every ride request; the number of passengers; the available vehicles; the vehicle locations; status; traffic; construction; weather; geography; ride times; wait times; and more all factor into matching the right vehicle with the right mission.
Included in the “more” are the considerations of surrounding demand and predicted future demand. Operators must make sure that there is always enough supply on hand and in the right locations to meet demand within defined service levels and operator utilization requirements.
Doing More with Less
The goal of fleet orchestration is all about sending the right mission to the right vehicle at the right time. Most mobility providers aim to carry as many paying riders (or goods) as possible while driving the fewest vehicles and miles/kilometers. Service providers that own their fleets and/or pay drivers by the hour want to make the most of every vehicle-mile/km.
Deadheading, the time traveling empty to fetch a new ride or to move to a different neighborhood, incurs costs (driver pay, fuel) while reducing revenue.
For autonomous vehicle services using electric vehicles, battery power plays a critical role in assigning missions to vehicles. It is also is an important service constraint that needs to be factored into fleet performance and fleet orchestration.
Anne Mellano is cofounder of Bestmile and directs the company’s global management activities. Bestmile empowers mobility providers to deploy, manage, and optimize autonomous and conventional driven vehicle fleets.
More Fleet Forward

NETS Crash-Cost Data and CoolSys’ 80% Loss Reduction Take Center Stage at FFC
NETS will present findings from its latest Cost of Crashes research, then CoolSys safety leader and author Shawn Martinez will explain how the company built a safer driving culture across 3,500 employees.
Read More →
Is Your Grey Fleet Creating an Unmanaged Safety Risk?
NCR Atleos Fleet Manager Jose Rocha will join Cardata and SambaSafety experts at Fleet Forward Conference to examine how fleets can extend safety oversight to every employee who drives for business.
Read More →
Agentic AI Session at FFC Will Help Fleets Turn Data Into TCO Action
Mike Albert Fleet Solutions and Motorq will show how agentic AI can uncover maintenance, fuel, and utilization savings buried across disconnected fleet data.
Read More →
Voting Opens for 2026 Fleet Hall of Fame
See the nominations for the 2026 Hall of Fame and select your choice for this year's class!
Read More →
7 Fleet Professionals Named Finalists for the 2026 Fleet Visionary Award
Meet the 2026 nominees for the Fleet Visionary Award.
Read More →
9 Fleet Leaders Nominated for the 2026 Fleet Manager of the Year Award
Meet the nine finalists for the 2026 Fleet Manager of the Year Award.
Read More →
Fleet Forward Conference to Debut First Registration-Based Analysis of Largest Commercial Fleets
The session will deliver an exclusive first look at registration data covering more than 1.5 million commercial vehicles, offering one of the industry's most detailed views of the private fleet market.
Read More →
Registration Opens for 2026 Fleet Forward Conference
Held on the East Coast for the first time, the Washington, D.C.-area event features expert-led education, a new IIHS Crash Test Experience, and collocation with the NAFA’s Fleet Safety Symposium.
Read More →
Earley, Mossing Named to NAFA's 2026 Class of Fellows
The honor recognizes five outstanding professionals whose leadership, service and contributions have made a significant impact on NAFA and the fleet management profession.
Read More →
