What are Preventable vs. Non-Preventable CMV Crashes?
Realizing some crashes are beyond a CMV driver’s control, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) created its Crash Preventability Program. But, what's considered preventable?

The FMCSA identifies several crash types as non-preventable.
Photo: Getty Images
The designation of a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) crash has serious implications. If the event appears as preventable, it impacts a motor carrier’s CSA Crash Indicator BASIC score and Accident Factor in the event of a compliance review.
Realizing some crashes are beyond a CMV driver’s control, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) created its Crash Preventability Program. In this program, the status of the crash can be challenged by motor carriers, drivers, or other parties by submitting a Request for Data Review (RDR) through the agency’s DataQs portal.
Qualifying Crashes
The FMCSA identifies several crash types as non-preventable. CMV crashes meeting the specific criteria and occurring on or after August 1, 2019, are eligible for consideration.
An eligible CMV crash involves being struck:
In the rear or side at the rear;
By a motorist driving in the wrong direction or making a U-turn or illegal turn;
When legally stopped at a traffic control device or parked;
By a vehicle failing to stop or slow in traffic or stop at a traffic control device;
By a driver operating a motor vehicle under the influence, according to state law, or by another motorist who was involved in such a crash;
By a driver who experienced a medical issue contributing to the crash;
By a driver who admitted falling asleep or being distracted;
By cargo, equipment, or debris, or as the result of an infrastructure failure;
By an animal; or
By an individual committing or attempting to commit suicide.
Another eligible crash category involves accidents that seldom occur and don’t meet another eligible crash type, such as being struck by an airplane or skydiver or being struck by a deceased driver.
Be Prepared to Prove Your Case
When using DataQs to challenge the preventability of a crash, the burden of proof is on the RDR submitter. The party must provide compelling evidence that the crash meets the criteria.
The RDR must be accompanied by a police accident report. For fatal crashes, the request must include drug and alcohol test results or explain why a test was not performed.
Submitters are encouraged to provide other supporting documents with their request, including videos, photographs, and court documents.
If the crash does not meet one of the eligible crash types, the RDR will be closed.
When the RDR is Successful
If a crash is deemed non-preventable, the FMCSA will:
Remove the crash from the carrier’s Crash Indictor calculations and indicate in the Safety Management System that the crash was not preventable; and
Add a note to the Pre-Employment Screening Program (PSP) to indicate that the crash was not preventable, reducing the odds that the driver involved wouldn’t be hired due to crash history.
Note that the crash must remain on the motor carrier’s accident register even though it is considered non-preventable. In the event of an audit, the motor carrier would alert the investigator that the specific crash was determined to be non-preventable, so it is not included in the accident rate.
Originally posted on Work Truck Online
More Safety
From Silos to Solutions: Relationship Management for Safer Fleets
From telematics adoption and driver accountability to policy consistency and risk mitigation, this episode breaks down what it really takes to build a safer fleet culture without slowing business down.
Read More →
IIHS Launches First Commercial Vehicle Safety Evaluations
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has begun evaluating heavy-duty pickups and cargo vans for driver protection. Which models earned top marks?
Read More →
Reducing Risk by Eliminating Phone Use Behind the Wheel
Hosted with the cofounder of Lifesaver Mobile, this episode addresses phone use behind the wheel and how to design a driving environment that actually helps prevents accidents.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-Time Prevention (Part 2 of 2)
Part Two: Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Continue learning more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab
Read More →
How 5-Second Telematics Data Is Changing Fleet Safety
This episode connects with Steve Santostasi of Ford Pro and covers how a few seconds of data can make a difference in fleet safety.
Read More →
Managing Road Risk at Scale: Why Fleet Safety Needs a Data-Driven Framework
Insights from the FIA Road and Driver Safety Indexes reveal how to manage road risk on a larger scale.
Read More →
Stellantis Recalls 1.3 Million Jeep Vehicles Worldwide Over Fire Risk
Stellantis is recalling more than 1.3 million Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator models worldwide over a fire risk linked to power steering pump wiring.
Read More →
Coaching Is Not Training, Even When AI Is Doing It
AI-powered safety platforms can detect risky behaviors and deliver immediate feedback. But effective driver development still requires a foundation of training followed by coaching that reinforces those skills.
Read More →
How Emotions Behind the Wheel Can Affect Fleet Safety
During National Safety Month, fleets are encouraged to look beyond distracted driving and recognize how stress, fatigue, and emotional well-being influence driver performance and crash risk.
Read More →
Nominations Open for 2026 Fleet Safety Award
Nominations have officially opened for the 2026 Fleet Safety Award Winner.
Read More →
