Clean Air! Clean Air! Rah! Rah! Rah! Dispatch from the College Clean Air Car Race of 1970
The automotive industry gave money and cars to work with, and other industries gave comparable support, but there should be no doubt about it-the Clean Air Car Race was a U.S. college student-founded, planned and executed event.
The automotive industry gave money and cars to work with, and other industries gave comparable support, but there should be no doubt about it-the Clean Air Car Race was a U.S. college student-founded, planned and executed event.
For better or worse, the youths set out from Cambridge, Mass. on August 24 in 43 vehicles designed to meet or better the Federal exhaust emission standards set for all new cars in 1975. The goal was to make the best time, while releasing the least emissions, to Pasadena, Calif. The entrants were to follow a route that touched into Canada, cut through the midwest and traversed the southwest through Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and Southern California.
It's tempting to report, "When the smoke had cleared-," but, in reality, there wasn't that much smoke -or pollution. It probably will be some time before all of the results are analyzed and the various power systems re-examined, but after three days of scoring, according to a pre-set mathematical equation, the overall winner of the race was Wayne State University of Detroit, Mich.
The entire Wayne team, captained by Richard A. Jeryan, included John Karol, Brian Geraghty, Alden Raquepau, Lawrence P. Wagle, Dan Harmon and Mike Riley. Their car was a 1971 Mercury Capri with a 302-cubic inch V8 internal combustion engine. It was equipped with an automatic transmission and used unleaded gas. The fuel system consisted of an electric fuel pump, insulated lines and a temperature-sensing carburetor. Emission controls included exhaust gas recirculation, catalytic reactors for NOx and air injection and two catalytic reactors for HC and CO.
The National Air Pollution Control Administration believes the Wayne State car may meet the standards they are setting for 1980 and wants to bring it, and other winners, into the Federal Clean Car Incentive Program to examine as possible alternatives to the present day passenger car.
At a victory luncheon in their honor, 50 representatives from the university and Ford Motor Company gave recognition to the four-man driving team and three-man support team. Certificates of recognition were presented by Norman O. Stockmeyer, chairman of WSU's board of governors, expressing appreciation for having made a substantial contribution to pollution abatement.
In modifying the Capri, the Wayne team installed an electric "in-tank" fuel pump, a spark delay valve, a controlled environment carburetor air cleaner and dual Englehard catalytic converters, an exhaust gas recirculation system.
The car also was made lighter by using different wheels, stripping the interior and installing fiberglass doors and hood. The Capri, which burned lead-sterile-even purer than unleaded gas-compiled this record while on the road:
It topped all entrants with 797 of a possible 1,000 points in a performance test in Cambridge covering acceleration braking, noise level and simulated urban driving conditions. The car scored 943 of a possible 1,000 points on fuel economy, averaging more than 23.5 miles-per-gallon while being tested between Ann Arbor and Oklahoma City. It also earned 997 of a possible 1,000 points for driving each of the seven legs within the allotted elapsed race time specified by the Clean Air Race rules committee.
According to a Wayne spokesman, the car did exceptionally well in "hot cycle" emissions testing in Cambridge and Pasadena, where hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides were sampled from the exhaust while the engine was warm.
The car did not fare well in "cold cycle" testing in Detroit during a constant volume sampling (CVS) from a cold engine because team members inadvertently pulled out the choke too far for about 20-seconds, which can be critical in such fine testing, the spokesman said. However, the team convinced the judges that the Detroit results were not a true reflection of the car's abilities, and two subsequent CVS tests in Pasadena proved the contention.
In all, 28 American and two Canadian universities were represented in the race with some type of car or cars. Of the other cars using internal combustion engines, the winners were Worcester Polytechnic Institute with a Chevrolet II Nova using LPG, and Stanford University's 1970 Gremlin using methyl alcohol for fuel.
The WPI winner in the ICE class was dubbed "The Propane Gasser." It had the high score of 3636 points based on emissions, performance, elapsed time, and thermal efficiency or fuel economy. The car's emission factor was 1.70. It had a 350-cubic inch Chevrolet V-8 engine which operated on a fuel ratio of 23 to 1 with richening to 19.5 to 1 after 4,000-rpm. It was equipped with a variable venturi propane carburetor with two barrel mounting on a factory manifold. The 35-water gallon capacity propane fuel tank was mounted in the trunk of the car. The WPI driving team claimed fuel mileage of 18 to 19.5 MPG and a range of about 535 miles-per-tank of fuel.
Stanford's Gremlin obtained about 200-miles from each 21-gallon tankful of alcohol. It used a conventional engine and was equipped with exhaust gas recirculation, water injection and a catalytic reactor.
Although the National LP-Gas Association was, rightfully, impressed with the "Gasser's" performance in the LP area, Southwest Factories, of Oklahoma City, who supported the entry, felt that the car should have figured higher in the standings.
According to a spokesman for Southwest, a valve was tightened too much before the race with the result that from that point on each emission test found some unburned fuel slipping by a valve and showing up in the exhaust as unburned hydrocarbons. The carbon monoxide tests were invariably extremely low, said Southwest, far below the 1980 "clean air" level. The nitrogen oxides emissions, they said, were quite good through all the tests, being appreciably better than the 1975 standards, but the unburned hydrocarbons were a problem all the way through.
In the Turbine-powered car class, Massachusetts Institute of Technology's '70 Chevrolet placed first and Cornell's '70 EFP sedan won in the electric division. Electric hybrids entered by Worcester Polytechnic and the University of Toronto tied in that section. Steam-powered cars failed at the start.
Coming at a time when many campus disruptions have been monopolizing the news, it seems almost as though the inspiration and example set by the very idea of the College Clean Air Car Race-and the enthusiasm of its participants-have already begun to conquer another type of pollution.
More Operations

How to Manage Conflict for Your Fleet Operations
Conflict management is becoming a core leadership skill. Here are five strategies fleet leaders should know.
Read More →
Turning Connected Vehicle Data Into Decisions That Matter
Fleet leaders have more data than ever, but turning that data into clear, actionable decisions remains a challenge. This white paper shows how leading organizations are using connected vehicle data to improve safety, reduce costs, and optimize fleet performance. Learn how to turn insight into action across your fleet.
Read More →
Cameras, Safety and Insurance: From Reactive Claims to Real-time Prevention
Commercial auto remains one of the most challenging and costly lines of coverage for fleet operators and insurers alike. Learn more about how to effectively address these issues from Onur Aksan, Enterprise Business Development Executive, Geotab.
Read More →Are You Tracking Your Fleet's True Total Cost of Ownership?
Bobit Business Media surveyed 190 fleet professionals and found that while most fleets are tracking costs, fragmented systems and data gaps are keeping true TCO visibility out of reach. With rising pressure to control spend in an increasingly volatile environment, the gap between what fleets think they know and what the data actually shows is wider than you might expect. See how your peers are managing costs today and where the industry still has room to improve.
Read More →
Turn Fleet Data Into Smarter Decisions
Fleet leaders have access to more operational data than ever, but disconnected systems and unclear metrics often slow decision-making instead of improving it. This article outlines five practical steps fleets can take to transform fragmented data into actionable insights that improve planning, safety, utilization, and long-term performance.
Read More →
Hybrids: Electrification Without the Challenges
For fleet managers, fuel is one of the biggest line items in the budget — and it's one hybrids can shrink without changing how your people work. Download the eBook to see the numbers, understand the technology, and get a step-by-step guide to making the switch.
Read More →
How NOV Uses Telematics to Improve Fleet Safety Across 160 Locations
James Victory of NOV discusses how the company manages fleet safety, maintenance, and telematics across more than 150 locations supporting oilfield operations throughout the U.S.
Read More →
Fleet Meets: Steven Santostasi
This edition of the Fleet Meets series features Steven Santostasi, the current TSP channel manager for Ford Pro.
Read More →
Why Fleet Managers Are Replacing Departmental Vehicles with Shared Motor Pools
Departmentally assigned vehicles often create hidden costs through underutilization, poor visibility, and increased administrative burden. This white paper explores how shared motor pool strategies help fleets reduce costs, improve accountability, and optimize vehicle utilization.
Read More →Soap Box Derby Challenge: Assembling the Crew
Meet Gabriel, Matthew, and Angel — the team helping bring this soap box derby build to life.
Read More →
