Clean Air! Clean Air! Rah! Rah! Rah! Dispatch from the College Clean Air Car Race of 1970
The automotive industry gave money and cars to work with, and other industries gave comparable support, but there should be no doubt about it-the Clean Air Car Race was a U.S. college student-founded, planned and executed event.
The automotive industry gave money and cars to work with, and other industries gave comparable support, but there should be no doubt about it-the Clean Air Car Race was a U.S. college student-founded, planned and executed event.
For better or worse, the youths set out from Cambridge, Mass. on August 24 in 43 vehicles designed to meet or better the Federal exhaust emission standards set for all new cars in 1975. The goal was to make the best time, while releasing the least emissions, to Pasadena, Calif. The entrants were to follow a route that touched into Canada, cut through the midwest and traversed the southwest through Oklahoma, Texas, Arizona and Southern California.
It's tempting to report, "When the smoke had cleared-," but, in reality, there wasn't that much smoke -or pollution. It probably will be some time before all of the results are analyzed and the various power systems re-examined, but after three days of scoring, according to a pre-set mathematical equation, the overall winner of the race was Wayne State University of Detroit, Mich.
The entire Wayne team, captained by Richard A. Jeryan, included John Karol, Brian Geraghty, Alden Raquepau, Lawrence P. Wagle, Dan Harmon and Mike Riley. Their car was a 1971 Mercury Capri with a 302-cubic inch V8 internal combustion engine. It was equipped with an automatic transmission and used unleaded gas. The fuel system consisted of an electric fuel pump, insulated lines and a temperature-sensing carburetor. Emission controls included exhaust gas recirculation, catalytic reactors for NOx and air injection and two catalytic reactors for HC and CO.
The National Air Pollution Control Administration believes the Wayne State car may meet the standards they are setting for 1980 and wants to bring it, and other winners, into the Federal Clean Car Incentive Program to examine as possible alternatives to the present day passenger car.
At a victory luncheon in their honor, 50 representatives from the university and Ford Motor Company gave recognition to the four-man driving team and three-man support team. Certificates of recognition were presented by Norman O. Stockmeyer, chairman of WSU's board of governors, expressing appreciation for having made a substantial contribution to pollution abatement.
In modifying the Capri, the Wayne team installed an electric "in-tank" fuel pump, a spark delay valve, a controlled environment carburetor air cleaner and dual Englehard catalytic converters, an exhaust gas recirculation system.
The car also was made lighter by using different wheels, stripping the interior and installing fiberglass doors and hood. The Capri, which burned lead-sterile-even purer than unleaded gas-compiled this record while on the road:
It topped all entrants with 797 of a possible 1,000 points in a performance test in Cambridge covering acceleration braking, noise level and simulated urban driving conditions. The car scored 943 of a possible 1,000 points on fuel economy, averaging more than 23.5 miles-per-gallon while being tested between Ann Arbor and Oklahoma City. It also earned 997 of a possible 1,000 points for driving each of the seven legs within the allotted elapsed race time specified by the Clean Air Race rules committee.
According to a Wayne spokesman, the car did exceptionally well in "hot cycle" emissions testing in Cambridge and Pasadena, where hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and nitrogen oxides were sampled from the exhaust while the engine was warm.
The car did not fare well in "cold cycle" testing in Detroit during a constant volume sampling (CVS) from a cold engine because team members inadvertently pulled out the choke too far for about 20-seconds, which can be critical in such fine testing, the spokesman said. However, the team convinced the judges that the Detroit results were not a true reflection of the car's abilities, and two subsequent CVS tests in Pasadena proved the contention.
In all, 28 American and two Canadian universities were represented in the race with some type of car or cars. Of the other cars using internal combustion engines, the winners were Worcester Polytechnic Institute with a Chevrolet II Nova using LPG, and Stanford University's 1970 Gremlin using methyl alcohol for fuel.
The WPI winner in the ICE class was dubbed "The Propane Gasser." It had the high score of 3636 points based on emissions, performance, elapsed time, and thermal efficiency or fuel economy. The car's emission factor was 1.70. It had a 350-cubic inch Chevrolet V-8 engine which operated on a fuel ratio of 23 to 1 with richening to 19.5 to 1 after 4,000-rpm. It was equipped with a variable venturi propane carburetor with two barrel mounting on a factory manifold. The 35-water gallon capacity propane fuel tank was mounted in the trunk of the car. The WPI driving team claimed fuel mileage of 18 to 19.5 MPG and a range of about 535 miles-per-tank of fuel.
Stanford's Gremlin obtained about 200-miles from each 21-gallon tankful of alcohol. It used a conventional engine and was equipped with exhaust gas recirculation, water injection and a catalytic reactor.
Although the National LP-Gas Association was, rightfully, impressed with the "Gasser's" performance in the LP area, Southwest Factories, of Oklahoma City, who supported the entry, felt that the car should have figured higher in the standings.
According to a spokesman for Southwest, a valve was tightened too much before the race with the result that from that point on each emission test found some unburned fuel slipping by a valve and showing up in the exhaust as unburned hydrocarbons. The carbon monoxide tests were invariably extremely low, said Southwest, far below the 1980 "clean air" level. The nitrogen oxides emissions, they said, were quite good through all the tests, being appreciably better than the 1975 standards, but the unburned hydrocarbons were a problem all the way through.
In the Turbine-powered car class, Massachusetts Institute of Technology's '70 Chevrolet placed first and Cornell's '70 EFP sedan won in the electric division. Electric hybrids entered by Worcester Polytechnic and the University of Toronto tied in that section. Steam-powered cars failed at the start.
Coming at a time when many campus disruptions have been monopolizing the news, it seems almost as though the inspiration and example set by the very idea of the College Clean Air Car Race-and the enthusiasm of its participants-have already begun to conquer another type of pollution.
More Operations

Reading the Global Signals: What AI and the Energy Transition Mean for Fleets Now
How can fleet managers navigate a never-ending, changing industry landscape?
Read More →
90% Use Telematics. Are Fleets Getting Safer? | AF News Recap
This week, we're breaking down which industries have the highest rates, how Jamie McKay manages 2,400 vehicles, what's happening with the 2027 fleet awards, and why software-defined vehicles could introduce new costs.
Read More →
What's Best Handled by an FMC, and What's Better Done Directly?
Fleet managers continue to rely on FMCs for essential services but are taking a closer look at where working directly with suppliers can improve efficiency and responsiveness.
Read More →
Fleet Meets: Erin Gilchrist
Meet Erin Gilchrist, the inaugural Mike Antich Spirit of Fleet Award winner, as she shares insights on leadership, mentorship, the power of industry connections, and why people remain at the heart of fleet's future.
Read More →
How 2026 Fleet Visionary Jamie McKay Manages 2,400 Vehicles Across 37 States
How do you keep 2,400 vehicles running across 37 states? Fleet Visionary Award winner Jamie McKay shares how collaboration, flexibility, and a few simple strategies help her tackle fleet management challenges at Aptive Pest Control.
Read More →
Managing Fleet Costs in an Era of Permanent Volatility
Fleet operating costs have risen more than 20% since 2020, raising a key question: When does extending a vehicle's service life stop making financial sense?
Read More →
The Next Evolution of Fleet Management: Autonomous Operations
This opening keynote session at the Fleet Forward Conference highlights the future of autonomous driving for fleets.
Read More →
How to Reduce the Total Cost of Risk From Catalytic Converter Theft
A stolen catalytic converter can cost fleets far more in downtime and lost productivity than in repairs. A total-cost-of-risk approach can help fleet managers quantify their exposure and prioritize theft prevention.
Read More →
Personal-Use Charges Rise as Vehicle Values Fall | AF News Recap
Personal-use charges are climbing, wholesale used-vehicle values are declining, and commercial fleet sales growth is slowing. This week, we're breaking down the latest fleet data, plus how Element Fleet Management is helping Waymo prepare for its first Canadian robotaxi market.
Read More →
Here's When You Should Make an Exception to Fleet Policy
Fleet policies are designed to create consistency, but not every driver or situation fits neatly within standard rules.
Read More →
