Legislators in both Maryland and Louisiana are considering new insurance industry restrictions on the use of aftermarket replacement parts for vehicle repair.
by Staff
March 14, 2016
Photo of Maryland State Capitol Building by Marylandstater of English Wikipedia via Wikimedia Commons.
1 min to read
Photo of Maryland State Capitol Building by Marylandstater of English Wikipedia via Wikimedia Commons.
State legislators in both Maryland and Louisiana are considering bills that would in some ways restrict insurance companies from ordering the use of non-OEM replacement parts for collision repair claims.
The Louisiana bill (HB 559) would prohibit insurers from requiring or authorizing non-OEM safety parts for vehicle repair — unless the OEM parts were commercially unavailable to the repair facility or installer. If they were unavailable, the claimant/vehicle owner would need to be advised in writing that non-OEM parts would be used in the repair.
Ad Loading...
The bill defines safety parts as components used in a vehicle’s anti-lock braking system or air bag restraint system. If passed into law, the legislation would become effective Jan. 1.
The Maryland bill (HB 1258) would prohibit insurers from ordering or authorizing non-OEM replacement parts during the first two years after a vehicle is manufactured. The restriction would apply to fenders, bumpers, door panels, hoods, grilles, wheel wells and front and rear lamp display panels.
After the two-year period, insurers could authorize non-OEM aftermarket parts only if a nonprofit, nationally accredited developer of standards had certified the parts. Such parts would be subject to regular testing by an independent third-party facility.
If passed into law, the Maryland bill would also take effect Jan. 1, 2017.
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Fleets have more driver data than ever, so why isn't behavior changing? Training requires more than reports and coaching — it requires real-world practice.
A two-part conversation with Stefan Heck on how AI is transforming the fight against distracted driving. As fleets adopt smarter tools, the focus shifts from reacting to preventing risk. In Part 1, we look at where AI is making an impact for fleets today.
An 11% drop in pedestrian fatalities in early 2025 signals progress in U.S. road safety, but elevated death rates and ongoing risks underscore the need for continued action from fleets and policymakers.
