MENU
SEARCHStructural enhancements for the 2015 model year pay off, with the hatchback showing marked improvement in its latest IIHS crash test performance.
Photo: IIHS
The Kia Soul, a compact previously rated “poor” in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's small overlap front test, recently drew a “good” rating in the test – a result of structural improvements for the 2015 model year.
That impressive test score, combined with “good” ratings in IIHS’s four other crashworthiness evaluations, qualified the Soul for the IIHS Top Safety Pick award.
To view video footage of the small overlap crash test, click on the photo or link above.
Additionally, the Kia Forte also improved after the manufacturer made changes, but only to a “marginal” rating, IIHS said.
The 2013-MY Soul and the 2014-MY Forte both drew “poor” ratings in the small overlap test. But the front end and occupant compartment were strengthened for 2015.
In the test of the 2015-MY Soul, the driver space was “maintained reasonably well with a small amount of intrusion,” IIHS said. “The dummy's movement was well controlled, and its head hit the frontal airbag, which stayed in position during the crash. The side curtain airbag deployed and provided sufficient coverage to protect the head from contact with side structure and outside objects.”
All measurements recorded on the dummy indicated a low risk of any significant injuries in a crash of this severity, IIHS added.
Like the Soul, the Forte got significant structural upgrades to the occupant compartment. Compared with the 2014 model, one of the worst performers of any vehicle tested by IIHS for small overlap protection, the 2015 model fared much better. Nonetheless, its overall rating still is only “marginal,” IIHS said.
“Even with the stronger occupant compartment, the driver's space wasn't maintained well, with intrusion approaching 8 inches at the lower hinge pillar,” IIHS noted. “The dummy's head slid off the frontal airbag and struck the instrument panel, as the safety belt allowed too much forward motion. The side airbag also lacked sufficient coverage to protect the head. Nevertheless, injury measures on the dummy were low.”
IIHS introduced the small overlap evaluation in 2012. In the test, 25 percent of a vehicle's front end on the driver side strikes a rigid barrier at 40 mph. The crash replicates what happens when the front corner of a vehicle collides with another vehicle or an object such as a tree or a utility pole.
To qualify as a Top Safety Pick, a vehicle must earn a “good” or “acceptable” rating for small overlap protection and “good” ratings in the IIHS moderate overlap front, side, roof strength and head restraint tests.
Fleet drivers face constant visual, cognitive, and environmental interruptions the moment they hit the road. From roadside chaos to mental fatigue and digital overload, today’s biggest driving risks often come from outside the vehicle itself.
Read More →
FLASH Weather AI has launched a first-of-its-kind hail prediction model capable of forecasting hail size and arrival time at 1-kilometer resolution up to 55 minutes ahead, giving fleets and insurers critical time to prepare for severe storms.
Read More →
As litigation risk rises, vehicles are increasingly targeted. This Coca-Cola bottler shares how it’s reducing exposure through driver training, technology, and a proactive risk management approach.
Read More →
Drivers, supervisors, and data often speak different safety “languages.” Getting on the same page will drive better results.
Read More →
From identity management to third-party certifications, the right technology partner should make security easier to manage. Here are the three building blocks that fleet managers need to stay in control as connected systems scale.
Read More →
Distracted driving remains one of the most persistent risks in fleet operations. New approaches focus on removing mobile device use entirely while adding real-time safety support.
Read More →
As distraction risks evolve, fleets are turning to smarter, more connected technologies to better understand what’s happening behind the wheel. Part 2 explores how these tools are helping identify risky behaviors and improve visibility across operations.
Read More →
What fleets capture to improve safety can also expose them in litigation, forcing leaders to rethink how data is managed, stored, and shared.
Read More →
Distracted driving is often measured by what we can see—phones in hand, eyes off the road. But what about the distractions we can’t? A recent incident raises a bigger question about awareness, attention, and why subtle risks so often go unnoticed.
Read More →
While serious crashes are declining, a rise in minor incidents and ongoing risk hotspots underscore the need for continued fleet safety investment.
Read More →
