The Car and Truck Fleet and Leasing Management Magazine

Article

Fleet Selectors: How They Have Changed

Just as vehicles have changed over the decades, so have the selector forms fleet managers have used. Vehicle specifications have gone through significant changes, having been impacted by the economy, products and programs offered by manufacturers, operational requirements of the vehicles themselves, and the emergence of the import vehicle.

November 2011, Automotive Fleet - Feature

By Al Cavalli

SHARING TOOLS        | Print Subscribe

Company cars represent an integral means of seeing more people, accomplishing more in less time and less effort, resulting in greater productivity. It is perhaps the most valuable tool utilized by industry in general and represents an expense second only to salaries. As such, it demands an efficient, economical management approach not only in vehicle and equipment selection and assignment, but in the approach used to place a unit in service in the most expedient manner.

There are five separate, but related, areas that must be dealt with in developing these necessary procedures: 

  • Establishing the approved vehicle specification.
  • Providing a means for the operator’s selection.
  • Order placement.
  • Delivery confirmation.
  • Used-vehicle disposal.
  • Selecting the Vehicle

Over the years, fleet vehicle specifications have gone through significant changes, having been impacted by the economy, products and programs offered by manufacturers, operational requirements of the vehicles themselves, as well as the emergence of the import vehicle.

In the early days of fleet management, domestic brands ruled the roost with GM, Ford, and Chrysler predominating in the fleet market and, to a lesser degree, second-tier brands such as Studebaker, Hudson, Nash, and later American Motors, et al. They all generally offered models in just two levels — standard and deluxe — and for the majority of fleet operators, the standard lineup were the vehicles of choice.

In selecting vehicles to place in service, consideration had to be given to a variety of operational and economic factors, such as:

  • Initial cost.
  • Resale value.
  • Economy of operation.
  • Cargo-carrying capacity.
  • Type of operational terrain, e.g, urban, rural, off-road.
  • Multiple operator levels.
  • Weather conditions.
  • Number of regular occupants.

At new-model introductions, one would see fleet managers with tape measures checking the “lifting” required to get products into the trunk as well as the trunk dimensions. Invariably, the basic model of choice was often a standard, full-size, two-door coupe, along with a four-door model usually for management-level operators (where that distinction existed). An example of an approved vehicle at the time would have been:

  • Two-door coupe.
  • V-8 or “inline” eight-cylinder engine.
  • Standard transmission.
  • Driver-side rear-view mirror.
  • Heater (north of the Mason-Dixon Line) and antifreeze (alcohol or ethylene glycol).
  • Air conditioning (only below the 100-degree temperature line).

In addition, the air conditioning unit, in its infancy at the time, would most often be an aftermarket unit that could be transferred to the replacement vehicle. Seat belts (lap only), which came along in the 1950s, were optional and also available as an aftermarket item. Radios, considered to be distracting to the driver, were not normally approved. (By today’s standards, these are practically prehistoric specifications!)

Mid-size and compact models started to enter the picture during the late 1950s and 1960s with the introduction of such models as the Plymouth Valiant and the “K” bodies, Mercury’s Comet and Montego, Ford’s Falcon and Gran Torino, etc., eventually becoming the models of choice. The new vehicle could be a replacement, an addition, or an emergency acquisition, which would most often require an out-of-stock purchase, subject to model availability and cost.

Perhaps the first major impact on fleet vehicle selection (after WWII) was precipitated by the gasoline shortages of the ’70s, which piqued interest in mid-size and compact models along with V-6 and four-cylinder engines. Some fleets at the time converted entirely to compacts, a decision regretted later when they couldn’t do the job expected and suffered in the used-car market on resale. Unfortunately, this is a situation repeated too often today.

Comment On This Story

Name:  
Email:  
Comment: (Maximum 2000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that every comment is moderated.


Sponsored by

Blog

Market Trends

Mike Antich
What’s the ‘Tipping Point’ for Fuel Prices?

By Mike Antich
During the past decade, we’ve witnessed a steady escalation of fuel prices with forecasters extrapolating these trend lines to predict even higher future prices. What is the “tipping point” for the price of fuel before it starts to have a significant negative impact on senior management’s desire to operate a company-provided fleet?

Great Executives Empower Their Fleet Managers

By Mike Antich

Coach’s Blog

Ed Bobit
While the Economy Sputters, 2011 Was a Good Fleet Year

By Ed Bobit
With consumer confidence low, political bickering at a high, eroding 401(k) plans, massive national debt, and protesters in the streets, “fleet” remains a very bright segment. Here are some year-end reflections.

Consider Complete Safety Knowledge for Your Own Job Safety

By Ed Bobit

STORE

$175.00

Automotive Fleet Fact Books - Industry Statistics and Marketing Data 2000-2004

Automotive Fleet Fact Book Bundle- 2000-2004

Our annual Fact Books contain a ton of relevant industry statistics and data that is sure to keep your fleet department running smoothly.

Latest From Our Fleet Sites: