The Car and Truck Fleet and Leasing Management Magazine

U.S. DOT Delays Rear-view Camera Ruling Until the End of 2012

February 29, 2012

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray Lahood updated congressional committees on the proposed ruling to mandate the installation of rear-view cameras on late-model vehicles in a letter, saying the Department of Transportation (DOT) had decided to delay making a final ruling until the end of the 2012 calendar year.

"Safety is the number one priority at the Department of Transportation, and we give especially high priority to the safety of children,” the DOT said in a statement. “While the Department has made progress toward a final rule to improve rearward visibility, it has decided that further study and data analysis-including of a wider range of vehicles and drivers-is important to ensure the most protective and efficient rule possible. The Department remains committed to improving rearview visibility for the nation's fleet and we expect to complete our work and issue a final rule by December 31, 2012."

The original DOT proposal would mandate that automakers install back-up cameras in new vehicles via a gradual rollout. The proposed rule would require 10 percent of new vehicles to come from the factory equipped with rear-view cameras by Sept. 2012, 40 percent by Sept., 2013, and 100 percent by Sept., 2014.

Although the DOT is delaying the final ruling, the letter notes that Cameron Gulbransen Kids Transportation Safety Act of 2007 requires a final ruling no later than 36 months after the date of the Act's enactment, which occurred on February 28, 2011.

To illustrate the severity of the problem, NHTSA’s research estimates that backover crashes for all vehicle types cause 183 fatalities annually, In addition, these accidents cause between 6,700 and 7,419 injuries per year, though a number of those injuries are minor.

By Greg Basich

Twitter Facebook Google+


Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:

  1. 1. Kenn Coyer [ February 29, 2012 @ 09:06PM ]

    Good grief people, your studying this project to death. There are already cameras on some of the vehicles and they are proving to be life savers. So just mandates to have cameras put on all vehicles and let it be. The car companies have plenty of money right now, so that should not be a problem. If General Motors is going into a partnership with Peugeot then they've got money to put cameras on all their vehicles. They're going to make the consumer pay for it anyway so what's problem. We are talking about children's lives here and the emotional distress on the parents when they lose children. the camera technology has been out there for years, so let's use it. Best regards; – Kenn Coyer


Fleet Incentives

Determine the actual cost of owning and running a vehicle in your fleet. Compare vehicles by class and model.

Sponsored by

Saab, or Svenska Aeroplan Aktiebolaget (Swedish Aircraft Company), was founded in 1937 as an aircraft manufacturer and revealed its first prototype passenger car 10 years later after the formation of the Saab Car Division.

Read more

Up Next

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher