The Car and Truck Fleet and Leasing Management Magazine

NHTSA Defends Handling of Investigation of Toyota Vehicle Unintended Acceleration Events

July 30, 2012

WASHINGTON – The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA’s) Administrator David Strickland defended the organization’s investigation into unintended acceleration in Toyota vehicles in response to a letter from Senator Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) that questions whether the investigation was “too narrow” in its scope due to a phenomenon called “tin whiskers.”

Grassley’s letter says he received information, supported by documentation, from whistleblowers that raised concerns over the “tin whiskers” phenomenon in the accelerator pedal assembly and other vehicle electronics .NASA’s report defines “tin whiskers” as a phenomenon where “electronically conductive, crystalline structures of tin that sometimes grow from surfaces where tin (especially electroplated tin) is used as a final finish.”

According to Grassley’s letter, NASA’s report found these “tin whiskers” in a Toyota vehicle pedal assembly. In addition, a separate unintended acceleration study of a 2003 Camry conducted in the fall of 2011 found two “tin whiskers” inside.

From there, Grassley’s letter goes on to questions whether NHTSA has definitively determined the cause of unintended acceleration incidents or not. It questions why NHTSA involved NASA engineers in the investigation, whether NHTSA’s personnel lack the expertise to conduct investigations, about NHTSA’s position on “tin whiskers,” and whether the number of vehicles NHTSA and NASA inspected, out of a total of 9,698 complaints, was really enough to determine that “tin whiskers” aren’t a factor in unintended acceleration events.

In response, NHTSA’s Strickland sent a letter to Grassley that explained the steps NHTSA took in the investigation and its reasons for involving NASA. The letter said NHTSA involved NASA specifically to check for the tin whisker phenomenon to determine whether NHTSA investigators had missed anything. NASA’s conclusion, detailed in a report, was that it would take multiple, simultaneous shorts to cause a large throttle opening unintended acceleration event, and that the design of the system in Toyota vehicles can tolerate shorts without that occurring.

In terms of the number of vehicles inspected, NHTSA and NASA actually inspected a total of four Camry vehicles where the electronic throttle control detected a fault, lit the check engine light, and stored a trouble code. According to NHTSA, none of the other complaints showed the effect that type of fault had on vehicle operation, which was (in the four cases) an “abnormal” vehicle response (a “jerk”) when the driver applied the accelerator.

Lastly, Grassley asked a question about what factors contributed to the proposed April 12, 2012, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) related to FMVSS 124, “Accelerator Control Systems.” This rulemaking would require vehicle design changes in order to prevent pedal sticking or entrapment.

Strickland responded by saying the proposal came from the need to change the test procedure, conducted by NHTSA, to define what “disconnection” of an electronic throttle means, the receipt of reported incidents of vehicle pedals being trapped due to mechanical causes (not electronic ones), and crash investigations and analyses of existing data on crashes in NHTSA’s database.

For more information, you can read NHTSA's reports on its website.

By Greg Basich

Twitter Facebook Google+


Please note that comments may be moderated. 
Leave this field empty:

  1. 1. Ed Miller [ July 31, 2012 @ 08:18AM ]

    I don't think it's any big secret the NHTSA's investigation into unintended acceleration of Toyota vehicles was a witch hunt to divert attention from the plight of other manufacturers at the time. Toyota was doing pretty well, comparatively.

    The discovery of "tin whiskers" which had developed on some circuitry was a bonus AND they had to call in honest-to-goodness rocket scientists from NASA to find it. Even with the "tin whiskers" discovery, there was no conclusive evidence of an sincere problem save for the floor mats occasionally keeping a pedal depressed. A pair of scissors remedied that issue pretty quickly.

    I have never seen a governmental agency strive so hard to justify their existence as does the NHTSA. Their endless barrage of inept rulings and decisions cost the vehicle manufacturing community in this country billions of dollars and really don't improve much of anything.

    Yet, each and every day Americans beg the question as to why there's not an affordable, reliable new car on the market in the United States. The afore mentioned investigation is a superlative answer and a classic example of government making it hard to do business in this country.


Fleet Incentives

Determine the actual cost of owning and running a vehicle in your fleet. Compare vehicles by class and model.

Sponsored by

Terminology used in Australia and New Zealand to describe a closed-end lease where the lessor is also responsible for the cost of maintenance and registration.

Read more

Accident Costs Calculator

Use this calculator to see how much extra sales revenue your company needs to generate to make up for the profits lost as a result of fleet accidents.
Launch Accident Cost Calculator 

Up Next

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher