Two NYC Agencies Invest in CNG and Hybrid Power Alternatives
Fleet managers now must tackle issues of emissions, fuel economy, and global warming to mitigate the problems of pollution, taxes, and climate change.
The issues aren’t new for many government fleets and certainly not new for fleets in New York City (NYC). In the aftermath of the energy crises of the 1970s, New York State and City have been seeking and applying innovative technology to appease both government concerns and the public worried about health problems and environmental justice.
Now past the early setbacks ("teething" problems) that come with every new technology and with serious miles or years under their belts, two fleets were contacted for their views on how new technology is helping meet service goals while minimizing unwanted side effects. The fleets are the New York City Department of Sanitation (DSNY) compressed natural gas (CNG)-powered street sweeper fleet and the NYCTransit (NYCT) series-type hybrid buses.
DSNY Invests Early in CNG
A proud and famous city agency, DSNY is hardly a newcomer to cleaning things up, either in solid waste or vehicle emissions. It currently maintains a fleet of about 450 sweepers distributed among the City’s five boroughs and eight million-plus citizens.
Department employees do their work primarily during the day, along routes established in cooperation with the NYC Department of Transportation, which set up the well-known "alternate side of the street" parking system to eliminate a buildup of solid waste that attracts vermin and harbors disease.
New York City’s Department of Sanitation invested $2.9 million to build a state-of-the-art CNG station on its own property.
Because sweepers are essentially low-speed work vehicles and high-energy users, the fleet was identified early as a candidate for CNG operations. On its own initiative, DSNY incorporated CNG sweepers into its fleet in 1992. Like many CNG projects of the time, implementation was a work-in-progress. DSNY depended on local utilities (Con Edison and Keyspan Energy) to provide CNG at off-site locations and usually at 3,000 psi. Range was limited. Reliability was less than desired and pricing was higher.
Still, DSNY perceived potential in this vehicle, which was a modified stretched Johnston Model 4000. (Johnston is now Allianz Sweeper.)
‘Drivers Like Them’
In 2001, four additional CNG sweepers were delivered and in 2005, an additional five were added to the fleet. Each generation has improved on the previous version. Current fleet size is 19. The 2005 models fit very well with the rest of the DSNY sweeper fleet. The drivers like the new sweepers, and the vehicles are quieter. In addition, range is no longer a problem. They run on the same routes as diesel-powered sweepers. Reliability has improved.
The sweepers are used year-round in NYC’s true four-season environment. Climate temperatures run from 0 to 100 degrees Farenheit.
To help ease problems created by heavy vehicles, the cleaner-exhaust CNG sweepers are stationed in areas where high levels of asthma cases are reported. Hence, they sweep the streets of contamination and reduce the amount of air contaminants in the local environment.
DSNY’s faith in CNG is exemplified by its investment of $2.9 million to build a state-of-the-art CNG station on its own property. This station has 800 standard cubic feet per minute (SCFM) pumping capacity to deliver gas at a temperature compensated nominal 3,600 psi pressure. The department will take advantage of Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) and Clean Cities program funding to secure a 50-cent/gasoline-equivalent gallon federal incentive to own and operate a refueling facility.
Rocco DiRico, assistant commissioner for the DSNY Bureau of Motor Equipment, is pleased with the progress he has seen over the years. To minimize dependence on imported petroleum, the assistant commissioner feels CNG technology has evolved and that fleets who may have tried CNG in the past should "get back to this now." They should also pursue federal tax incentives to avoid extra burden on local taxpayers.