The Car and Truck Fleet and Leasing Management Magazine

Market Trends

Legitimate Concerns About Green Fleet Initiatives

October 4, 2012, by Mike Antich - Also by this author

What do fleet managers see as the future of green fleet sustainability initiatives within their organizations? In particular, will management support these initiatives with greater acquisition of non-petroleum-fueled vehicles, or will the emphasis continue to be selecting gasoline- or diesel-powered models with maximum fuel efficiency? Nowadays, most major corporations are ecologically oriented and sustainability conscious. Many corporations, especially multinationals, have set corporate CO2 reduction goals and recognize that fleet is one of the biggest emitters of CO2. A growing number of fleets are incorporating alternative-fuel vehicles as organizations institutionalize sustainability into corporate branding, and company vehicles are a very visible expression of these initiatives. Corporations and political subdivisions will support the use of alternative-fuel vehicles if they meet the job requirement and are not cost prohibitive.

The Complexity of Being a Green Fleet
Fleet sustainability will continue to play an important, albeit complex, role in the fleets of today and tomorrow. However, the majority of today’s fleets continue to select the most fuel-efficient gasoline- or diesel-powered vehicles to meet sustainability initiatives. For some fleets, this seems to be the only cost-effective solution, especially with today’s funding constraints. In this fiscal environment, the cost of doing business has prompted many companies not to buy vehicles that are more expensive than needed.

Companies have made great strides in altering the composition of their fleets by removing SUVs and utilizing more crossovers and sedans, many of which exceed 30 mpg. The focus is on optimizing vehicle selection by acquiring the smallest vehicle capable of fulfilling the fleet application, powered by the smallest displacement engine. This is often coupled with eco-driver training programs to maximize fuel economy. Many fleets have transitioned to four-cylinder engines only. A growing number of fleets are focusing on acquiring EPA SmartWay-certified vehicles. Similarly, many companies opt to use hybrids because they provide the needed range and are not dependent on an alternative refueling infrastructure.

Other green initiatives involve reducing fuel consumption by minimizing unnecessary idling, introducing telematics devices, eco-driving training, improved fuel reporting/monitoring, and improved PM compliance. So far, the GHG emissions goals have been achievable at many companies due to the more fuel-efficient conventionally powered OEM offerings. The near-term emphasis by many fleets will continue to be acquiring petroleum-fueled models with maximum fuel efficiency, with greater consideration to spec’ing smaller classes of vehicles.

Addressing Legitimate Fleet Concerns
For many fleets, a key issue regarding alt-fuel vehicles, especially EVs, is range. Many sales reps have large territories, some traveling as much as 250 miles per day. In extreme cases, some reps drive 40,000 miles per year, with the industry average around 24,000 miles. A corollary challenge is when company-owned vehicles are taken home by employees who may not live in areas supported by the appropriate refueling infrastructure. In the same vein, many field managers are resistant to accepting alt-fuel vehicles that may impact driver productivity by requiring them to go out of their way to buy fuel. In addition, other fleets may operate primarily in the rural areas, where there is an inadequate refueling infrastructure.

In the back of the minds of many fleet managers is the concern about being on the “bleeding” edge of technology, as expressed by one fleet manager: “I’m not sure about the future of vehicles — too much is happening and at a very rapid pace. This is one time I do not want to be a forerunner. Our company is ready, willing, and able to invest in and support sustainability for the long-term once there is a better understanding what might be the sustainability answer of the future. For example, I would hate to over-spend on electric if propane autogas is the long-term answer, just as I would hate to over-invest in CNG if hydrogen cells are going to be the future.”

Tackling Problems Head-On
Despite these challenges, there is an incipient feeling that green fleet initiatives are approaching a turning point, as verbalized by another fleet manager: “Past environmental progress always needed to be cost-neutral or to encompass savings in order to proceed. We are rapidly approaching a point where the roadblock of cost-neutral options may not hold sway as they have in the past. A reduction in GHG may be its own reward. We are not there yet, but I believe it is fast approaching.”

Should the innovators of today, the market leaders of the next generation, create mobility based upon antiquated fuel? The long-term answer is no, but until then, we can’t hide our heads in the sand. There continue to be legitimate fleet concerns about going green. We can’t hope to truly “green” corporate America’s fleets (beyond simply being public relations statements) until these issues are resolved. In the final analysis, if you want to solve a tough problem, you have to tackle it head-on. These are not easy problems to solve, but, then again, they are not insolvable either.

Let me know what you think.


  1. 1. Richard Battersby [ October 11, 2012 @ 11:30AM ]

    "..will management support these initiatives with greater acquisition of non-petroleum-fueled vehicles, or will the emphasis continue to be selecting gasoline- or diesel-powered models with maximum fuel efficiency?"

    The answer to this is a resounding "yes" on both counts. I don't see this as an either/or situation. The key to success is making options available. Alt fuels work in some areas and enhanced efficiency petroelum vehicles work in others. And let us not forget the bi-fuel vehicles which allow fleets to use alternative fuels where feasible, but still operate the same vehicle on petroleum fuels if needed. EREV's and PHEV's may be considered bi-fuel vehicles in this respect. These vehicles allow even the most cautious of fleets to field alternative fuel vehicles with little or no risk beyond the initial purchase price.

Comment On This Story

Email: (Email will not be displayed.)  

Comment: (Maximum 10000 characters)  
Leave this field empty:
* Please note that comments may be moderated.

Fleet Incentives

Determine the actual cost of owning and running a vehicle in your fleet. Compare vehicles by class and model.

Sponsored by

Accident management refers to a program wherein the leasing company or fleet management supplier handles some or all aspects of an accident in which a covered vehicle is involved.

Read more

Author Bio

Mike Antich

Editor and Associate Publisher

Mike has covered fleet management and remarketing for more than 20 years and entered the Fleet Hall of Fame in 2010.

» More

More From The World's Largest Fleet Publisher